Answer:
Marbury v. Madison strengthened the federal judiciary by establishing for it the power of judicial review, by which the federal courts could declare legislation, as well as executive and administrative actions, inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution (“unconstitutional”) and therefore null and void.
Explanation:
In dramaturgical sociology it is contended
that the components of human connections are reliant on upon time, place, and
audience. The three that are mentioned above are the props. Props in this
perspective are the key points in keeping the “story” alive. All of those objects
that are purchased by Cari can make-up the entire demonstration of her house.
Answer:
The framers built a system of checks and balances designed to guard against tyranny by ensuring that no branch would grab too much power.
Explanation:
I can give you five slogans to choose from:
1. The power of all will make corruption fall.
2. We must all fight because corruption is not right.
3. Corruption will be gone if we all act as one.
4. Our strength is corruption's death.
5. If we fight together, corruption will wither.
Answer:
All three cases went to the Supreme Court for ruling.
Explanation:
The cases that went to the supreme corut ruling will be more likely to be considered as a landmark decision, which is the type of decisions that influence the live of the people on national scale.
I'll describe the effect of each decisions on national scale:
-Plessy v. Ferguson,
This decision resulted in the application of segregation law. Black people all across the nation were required to use different public facilities than the white citizens because of this.
- Brown v. Board of Education,
This decision diminish the effect of plessy v. Ferguson since it make the segregation of schools become illegal.
- Regents of California v. Bakke
This affect the people nationally because it allow race to become a factor for college admission . (It become the basis of affirmative action that help minorities get into universities)
