Should Oregon pass a statute that prohibited advertisement by liquor stores, it would amount to an unreasonable restriction of free speech and therefore invalid.
The correct answer is D.
<h3>The Law Backing Freedom of Speech and Expression</h3>
The First Amendment guarantees that citizen of the United States is free to express themselves in relation to their religion, expression, assembly, and also grants the right to petition.
There are situations where this freedom may be withdrawn. Please learn more at the link below:
brainly.com/question/243946
Answer: Unit management enhances communication between staff and inmates, maintains regularity for employees and inmates alike, empowers decision-making at the front-line level, and increases direct supervision and monitoring of offenders.
Explanation: ye
Answer: (B) That government cannot make a law respecting an establishment of religion.
Explanation:
The first amendment establish the clause that the government are prohibited for making the law " Respect to the establishment of the religion". This first amendment clause also prohibits the government from the action that favor the one religion over the another religion.
The establishment of this type of clause is to frame the particular government actions which is mainly related to the religion. The beliefs of religion are mainly protected by the first amendment.
Therefore, Option (B) is correct.
Answer:
Brown v. Ohio is the case of the Double Jeopardy Clause ruled by the Supreme Court of the US on June 16, 1977.
Explanation:
"Brown v Ohio" is a landmark case in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States. In this case, Nathaniel Brown stole a Chevrolet an East Cleveland and was caught nine days later by Wickliffe officials. He was charged with 'joyriding' by Wickliffe officials and sentenced to jail for one month with a penalty of $100. After his release, he went to East Cleveland, where he was again caught and convicted of the same. Brown, then, pleaded the Double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment in the Supreme Court, where the courts reversed the Appalette court's decision.
