Based on accounting principles, a $1 per unit tax levied on consumers of a good is equivalent to "a $1 per unit tax levied on producers of the good."
This is based on the idea that the market reaches the exact equilibrium price irrespective of who is accountable for paying the money to the government.
In other words, when the government levies a tax on a good, producers are not exempted from the tax levy because that money will be recouped from the producers' sales or revenue.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that tax on goods is inevitable to consumers and producers.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/22680521
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
Answer:
Explanation:
In the context of Human Resources, turnover refers to the number of workers who leave the organization. A scenario where an increase is what is needed the most would be if the current employees are unable to efficiently and effectively complete their work and are costing the company more money than they are producing in sales. Therefore, if those employees leave the company will save money on them and can hire newer employees that may perform much more efficiently.
Answer:d
Explanation: Economic instability can include a volatile inflation rate and volatile rate of economic growth. It can involve higher unemployment and uncertainty about the economic cycle.
big fall in stock markets can trigger falls in consumer confidence and lead to a recession. The Wall Street crash of 1929 was a primary cause of the great depression. However, the stock market crash of 1987 did not cause an economic downturn. In fact, in the UK it was followed by an unprecedented economic boom. This was partly due to the way the government responded by cutting income tax and cutting interest rates. Interest rates are used as a tool in controlling inflation. However, they can also have an impact on consumer spending. Sometimes interest rates may have little impact; however, if they coincide with other factors they can cause a much bigger than expected fall in consumer spending. For example, in the UK, many homeowners have a variable mortgage. Therefore a small change in interest rates can have a big effect on disposable income. If an increase in interest rates was combined with another factor such as the slowing down of house price growth it may cause a big fall in spending. Number One priority to Target Economic growth and reduce unemployment. At the very least, economic growth needs to be close to long run trend rate 2.5%; it actually needs to be higher to catch up with lost spare capacity. Strong growth will help boost tax revenues and reduce unemployment. It is only in this climate you can successfully reduce the deficit. There is supply-side unemployment, especially in Europe, which has seen prolonged structural unemployment in past two decades. But, the fundamental cause is lack of aggregate demand
Answer:
Total cost is equal to $81300
So option (c) will be correct answer.
Explanation:
Actual unit of production = 42000
Cost of per equivalent material = $1.10
Equivalent cost of material = 
$
Equivalent cost of labor = 
$
Therefore total cost of production = $46200+$35100 = $81300
So total cost will be $81300
Therefore option (c) is the correct answer
