I believe that the answer for this question would be A, States' rights.
Answer: Principle of discrimination.
Explanation:
The principle of discrimination indicates that in a war, the soldiers must be the targets of attack, while it is necessary to avoid attacking or harming civilians. It also indicates when it is moral or not to attack a soldier; for example, it is immoral to attack violently a soldier who has surrendered.
However, "collateral damage" is inevitable in wars. This is the destruction that is created and the damage that civilians receive when soldiers are attacked.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
Is it a true or false question?
Explanation:
Answer:
<h2>How to body a paragraph :)</h2>
<em>Topic sentence</em> (also known as the "hook," state your opinion / point of view
<em>Major supporting evidence</em>
<em>Minor support 1</em>
<em>Minor support 2</em>
<em>Conclusion</em> (restate main topic sentence + summarize your 3 points pf evidence)
Explanation:
Example:
"<em>In the movie "Iron Will" / "Mazy May" the use of dogs as work animals is protrayed as postive/negative by...(give example). Because of this, I agree/disagree with the use of dogs as work animals.</em>"
Now <em>expand</em> on that first example, use "<em>pathos ethos logos</em>" to create an emotional but also <em>logical </em>reason for your opinion. (This means, use both emotional examples from these films, and also logical examples (how the dogs as work animals were helpful / useful compared to other animals...or not if you are against that view))
Add 2 more <em>minor</em> examples, but keep them vague so that the paragraph does not become too lengthy (<em>this is not an essay</em>).
Summarize your points, and restate your opinion.
Answer:
Both Israel and Palestine have territorial claims on the same territories in the Middle East, basing their claims on different, but equally valid historical circumstances: on the one hand, Israel does so insofar as the territory is part of the so-called Promised Land of the Old Testament, while Palestine does so as its natural inhabitants of said territory for centuries.
In both cases, these are valid reasons that cannot be ignored; the problem is precisely that territorial claims are in conflict. Therefore, it should be possible to find an intermediate solution, which satisfies both nations and in which both should give up a part of their claims. One possibility would be to divide the territory, creating two sovereign states with shared possession in important places like Jerusalem.