The approach suggest that a firm's cost of retained earnings can be estimated by adding a risk premium of 3% to 5% points to the before-tax interest rate on the firm's own long-term debt.
The bond-yield-plus-risk-premium approach does assumes that cost of equity is closely related to the firm's cost of debt.
- The premium approach does help to determine the value of an assetof a company's such as its traded equity.
However, the approach suggest that a firm's cost of retained earnings can be estimated by adding a risk premium of 3% to 5% points to the before-tax interest rate on the firm's own long-term debt.
Read more about the premium approach:
<em>brainly.com/question/20354983</em>
Answer:
E. All the statements are correct
Explanation:
i. Corporations rarely pay tax on the interest income.
This statement is correct. Some companies do not even pay any income taxes.
ii. Higher tax bracket people tend to buy municipal bond because it is federal tax exempt.
Correct, people who have high incomes, and are subject to a high federal income tax rate often buy municipal bonds because these bonds are exempt from federal income tax.
iii. Short term capital gain and long-term capital gain are treated differently for individuals.
Correct. Short-term capital gains are those obtained from the sale of property that was owned for less than one year. This gains are often treated with the highest tax rate.
Long-term capital gains are those obtained from the sale of property that was owned for more than one year, and are treated with more favorable tax rates.
iv. The corporate tax rates in the U.S. is one of the lowest among the developed nations.
This statement is correct. The corporate tax rate in the U.S. is a nominal 21% (the effective rate can be as low as 0% for some companies). This is one of the lowest rates among developed nations, whose rates hover around 25 to 30% on average.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of composite score for each location is shown below:-
Composite score for A is
= 0.15 × 89 + .20 × 75 + 0.18 × 92 + 0.27 × 92 + 0.10 × 93 + 0.10 × 90
= 88.05
Composite score for B is
= 0.15 × 78 + .20 × 93 + 0.18 × 90 + 0.27 × 93 + 0.10 × 97 + 0.10 × 96
= 90.91
Composite score for C is
= 0.15 × 84 + .20 × 98 + 0.18 × 87 + 0.27 × 82 + 0.10 × 84 + 0.10 × 95
= 87.90
Therefore for computing the composite score for each location we simply multiply weight with A location and in the same manner of A, B and C
b. The maximum composite score from A, B and C is B
Plz don’t report me I’m just trying to do my homework like y’all
Answer:
2. Limited supply would increase the price
Explanation:
In the given case the vendor sells in advance four thousand units for $300. While the installed capacity of the factory being to produce 1000 smartphones every month.
Expected sales being 500 units per month.
During the first few months, since the seller has already successfully sold 4000 smartphone units, high demand for the smartphones is evident.
Since the supply is limited to 1000 units only in a month and the quantity demanded being more as is evident by 4000 units being pre sold, during the initial phase, this would create a high demand.
And since the supply is limited, the seller will have to increase the price as the demand is lot more.
