However, since we have 3 sets of 4, what can we do with the two exponents to avoid expansion?
1 answer:
You might be interested in
They did not include the constraint for y ≤x+3 on the graph.
See attached picture with added constraint.
Using the 4 points that are given as the solution on the graph, replace t he x and Y in the original equation to solve and see which is the greater value.
Point (0,3) P = -0 +3(3) = 0+9 = 9
Point (1,4) P = -1 + 3(4) = -1 +12 = 11
Point (0,0) P = -0 + 3(0) = 0 + 0 = 0
Point (3,0) P = -3 + 3(0) = -3 + 0 = -3
The correct solution to maximize P is (1,4)
Answer:
An electronics company can be produce 350 transistors and 340 computer chips, they can´t produce resistors.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. We will name the variables for transistors, resistors and the computer chips.
a = Transistors
b= Resistors
c = Computer chips
2. We propose three linear equations, one for the copper, one for the zinc and one for the glass.
3. We write the matrix form as Ax=d
With this formula the solution of x is or
4. We will find the inverse matrix using the formula:
a. det A
b.
c.
5. As or
, the solution of x is:
<u><em>Therefore:</em></u>
<u><em>a= 350 Transistors</em></u>
<u><em>b=0 Resistors</em></u>
<u><em>c=340 Computer chips</em></u>