He first two are relatively easy. f(x-2) shifts it sideways (2 to the right in this case) f(x) -2 shifts it straight down (by 2)
f(2x) means replace x with 2x in the original 4(2x + 1)^2 − 3 if you factor out the 2 from the square root you get 4*sqr(2) ( x + ½)^2 - 3 which is now in the form a ( x -h)^2 + k the vertex is now at (-½, -3) (it used to be at (-1,-3) the "a" has gotten bigger, which makes the parabola "skinnier" (it goes up faster)
2•f(x) becomes 2*( 4(x + 1)2 − 3 ) = 8 (x+1)^2 -6 where is the vertex now? is this parabola fatter or skinnier than the original f(x) ?
Same strategy as before: transform <em>X</em> ∼ Normal(76.0, 12.5) to <em>Z</em> ∼ Normal(0, 1) via
<em>Z</em> = (<em>X</em> - <em>µ</em>) / <em>σ</em> ↔ <em>X</em> = <em>µ</em> + <em>σ</em> <em>Z</em>
where <em>µ</em> is the mean and <em>σ</em> is the standard deviation of <em>X</em>.
P(<em>X</em> < 79) = P((<em>X</em> - 76.0) / 12.5 < (79 - 76.0) / 12.5)
… = P(<em>Z</em> < 0.24)
… ≈ 0.5948
It would make 5 complete frames, and about 8/10 of another frame.
108 / 18.375 = 5.8&*)&^&%*$*
I used a calculator.
You could keep adding 18 and 3/8 over and over again until you get right under 108 if you're good at math like me, but most people would have to add 18 and 3/8 separately.
Thanks, and if you liked my answer, please consider giving me the brainliest answer, because I need 5 of them to get to the next level.
Answer: it is 13+13=26
Step-by-step explanation:
I don’t care.
Answer:
The answer would be B if its reffering to the photo and A if its reffering to the scale.
