1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Damm [24]
3 years ago
8

Bill and his family are visiting Sydney for the weekend. They live in Victoria and decide to have a week away during the summer

holidays. They stay at the Shangri-La Hotel and as part of their package, receive a buffet lunch each day. On their second day at the hotel, Bill slipped on some grapes that were on the floor near the lunch buffet. As a result of the slip, Bill broke his ankle and was required to undergo surgery. He was off work for a period of 2 months and was unable to earn an income. Bill is suing for the total sum of $150,000. At the time of the fall, Bill reported the incident to the banquet manager who indicated they were not sure how long the grapes had been on the floor before the slip occurred. The incident report also noted Bill had consumed a number of glasses of wine before the slip.
Representing Bill as the plaintiff and the Shangri-La Hotel as the defendant, you are to make arguments to the Court as to who is liable in negligence for Bill’s injuries. You should argue the case referring to the relevant legislation and any case law. You should also identify the relevant jurisdiction in which the claim is brought.
Law
1 answer:
tankabanditka [31]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

if that is shangri la hotel it's sure that there will be web cam for security and find the exact time that incident happen.also check where his family went. if he really drank wine then it must be someone from his family or it maybe someone waiter or other first understand what happen and try to combine it together you will know the result best of luck

You might be interested in
Which criminal justice perspective emphasizes the efficient
AnnyKZ [126]

Answer:

the crime-control model

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
OJ Simpson's "Dream Team" of lawyers and
lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

On June 12, 1994, Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman, were found dead at Brown's home. Prosecutors argued that Simpson killed his ex-wife and her lover out of jealousy. Prosecutors began by reporting Nicole Brown Simpson's call to the emergency center from 1989. In it, Nicole Brown said she was afraid Simpson would harm her. Prosecutors also came up with Simpson's DNA material and shoe prints from him, found at the scene of the crime. Dozens of experts stated that Simpson must have been at the scene of the crime. There was a lot of circumstantial scientific evidence.

Simpson hired a team of expensive attorneys led by Robert Shapiro and later Johnnie Cochran. Cochran was nationally known as a lawyer for (mainly black) celebrities and specialized in cases involving discrimination or police brutality. From the outset, the defense was based on the charge of racism. The lawyers claimed that Simpson had been a victim of police fraud by depositing evidence against Simpson at the crime scene. The leader of the investigation into the double murder (Mark Fuhrman) was called a racist by the defense, and the lawyers found footage in which Fuhrman had used the N word.

While prosecutors believed they had a solid case and expected a conviction, polls showed that a majority of black residents of the United States believed that Simpson had been a victim of police fraud. Most white residents of the United States were convinced of Simpson's guilt. As the jury's verdict drew closer, racial tension rose, and some politicians feared a repeat of the Los Angeles race riots a few years earlier. On October 3, 1995 Simpson was acquitted of murder by the jury.

6 0
3 years ago
In illegal act that involves telling lies to obtain money or property
nadezda [96]

Answer:

fruad

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many years after the declaration of independence was the constitution written
amid [387]
12 years after the declaration of independence, the constitution written
8 0
4 years ago
Explain the importance of political parties​
murzikaleks [220]

Answer:

political parties evolved to mobilize the growing mass of voters as the means of political control. Political parties became institutionalized to accomplish this essential task.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The local mall' has had complaints about roaming groups of teenagers frightening away the clientele. In an effort to address the
    15·1 answer
  • How does the Fourth Amendment protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the police? When are there exceptio
    5·1 answer
  • Group of people who decide a case after hearing the evidence are called
    9·1 answer
  • Facts of the case
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following best illustrates an application of Newton’s First Law (also called the Law of Inertia)? A A passenger not
    14·1 answer
  • How do i cancel my subscription? I do not need this account
    12·1 answer
  • Voice: sometimes his behavior annoys me.​
    12·1 answer
  • Would you rather get imposter every game of among us or get 100 dollars every time somebody lies
    9·2 answers
  • What is the final step of any historical research project?
    10·2 answers
  • There Are 2 types of distracted drivers which 2 types of drivers are they
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!