Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
A good scientific hypothesis must have if and then in the sentence.
The result was the 12th Amendment, approved in Congress on December 9, 1803, and ratified on June 15, 1804, in time for the new process to be in place for the 1804 election, With the 12th, Electors are directed to vote for a President and for a Vice President rather than for two choices for President.
Answer: the georgia general assembly immediately implented it
Explanation:
Large knowledge structures. hope this helps (:
