Answer:
She used inductive reasoning. (False)
She used the law of detachment. (True)
Her conclusion is valid. (True)
The statements can be represented as "if p, then q and if q, then r." (False)
Her conclusion is true. (True)
Step-by-step explanation:
p = Two lines are perpendicular
q = They intersect at Right angles.
Given: A and B are perpendicular
Conclusion: A and B intersect at right angle.
According to the law of detachment, There are two premises (statements that are accepted as true) and a conclusion. They must follow the pattern as shown below.
Statement 1: If p, then q.
Statement 2: p
Conclusion: q
In our case the pattern is followed. The truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion. So her conclusion is true and valid.
5 hours because 800/25=32
32= 2^5
25 X 1 = 25
25 X 2 = 50 AFTER FIRST HOUR
25 X 2^5 = 800 AFTER FIFTH HOUR
It would be 2.9 because if the number to the right of the number your rounding is 5 or higher you round up to the next number. If the number is 4 or lower you round down to a 0.
you would multiply 10 x -12 by distributing the 10 into the parenthesis.
The answer would be negative because a postive times a negative is a negative.
The answer is -120
