Looking at this in terms of sets, let's call O the set of all owls, and F the set of all things that can fly. What this original statement is saying every animal that's a member of the set of all owls is also a member of the set of all things that can fly, or in other words, O⊂F (O is a subset of F). Negating this tells us that, while there's <em>at least one</em> element of O that also belongs to F, O is not contained entirely in F (O⊆F, in notation), so a good negation or our original statement might be:
<em>Not all owls can fly.</em>
Answer:
He washed 4 cars.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. The variable that was unknown x amount of cars washed.
2.The equation I used was 110-50=15x
3. To solve this you subtract the 50$ from 110$ you get sixty dollars you do that to take out what he earned for his allowance. Then your equation is 60=15x so you divide each side by 15 and when you do that x=4
Answer:
Dave needs to mow 14 lawns to have enough money to buy a bike.
Step-by-step explanation:
180-40=140, 140/10=14. Dave needs to mow 14 lawns to have enough to buy a bike.
Answer:
5.73
Best of luck
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
with what
Step-by-step explanation:
what do you need help with if there was photo we can't see it
