Answer:
D - No, the ordered pair (4,9) is a solution to this problem.
Step-by-step explanation:
If you plotted the number of snacks as the x-axis, and then the total cost of the snacks on the y-axis, you would be able to graph a line and see the cost of snacks based on the number purchased. If you were going to write an equation for this, it would be y=2.25x (or y = 2 1/4 x)
In this case, as each snack is the same price, the y-values for each x would be as such: (1, 2.25) <- one snack, $2.25;
(2, 4.5)
(3, 6.75)
(4, 9)
So that is why the ordered pair of (4,9) would be a solution to this problem.
Hope that makes sense!
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
19 weeks
Step-by-step explanation:
Given equation:
P = w
Where,
w = the number of weeks he has taken piano lessons
p = the total number of pieces he has learned
how many weeks of piano lessons will Lamar need before he will be able to play a total of 19 pieces?
Find w when p = 19
P = w
p = 19
Since P = w
19 = w
Therefore,
w = 19
Lamar need 19 weeks before he will be able to play a total of 19 pieces
(5+1)2 - (12+32) + 3
6 (2) - 44 + 3
12 - 44 + 3 = -29
Answer:
It will depend on how many euros they intend to convert. If they were only converting one euro they would get $1.35 whichever rate they used, but imagine it was a thousand euros - at the correct rate they would get $1352.61, at the proposed rate they would only get $1350.
Step-by-step explanation:
No, by rounding the conversion ratio, the Ruiz family will not be getting the most accurate answer. Using the more accurate conversion ratio will give an answer with more than 2 decimal places so the answer can accurately be rounded after the conversion.
