Explanation:
in the early 1800s, asylums were an institution where the mentally ill were held.
Answer: A) Hobbes thought people were innately violent.
<u>Further explanation</u>:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and violent toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
A. Pennsylvania is your answer.
Please mark branliest.
-Austin <3
Answer:
It could carry more weight
Explanation:
The horse made a much better work animal than the dog because it could carry more weight than a dog. just by the fact it's so much bigger, so much stronger. It's strength was definitely the major reason why it was preferred to the dog, but the horse also adapts easily to its environment. Even if a horse eats more than a dog, because of its size, the benefits of using it for work are much bigger.
It's also much more calm and docile than most dogs, although some dog races are quite good at training and being used as assistance animal for the handicapped or blind people.
Answer:
This visual narration is called The Bayeux Tapestry, a tapestry crafted in the 11th century and served as a journal relating to the Norman invasion of the British Islands in 1066. The historical significance of this art is that the tapestry tells the story of the conquest of England by William trough the Norman perspective, highlighting each aspect of this war, creating an interesting narrative.
Explanation:
The Bayeux Tapestry, 69 meters long, about 50 cm wide and 58 scenes, tells the story of the Norman conquest of England in 1066 (from the Norman point of view), and magnificently depicts many scenes of noble everyday life of the late 11th century, in addition to the Anglo-Saxon defeat of the forces of Harold II, king of England at the battle of Hastings in 1066.
