<u>Corrected Question</u>
The solution to an inequality is represented by the number line. How can this same solution be written using set-builder notation? {x | x > }
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given an inequality whose solution is represented by the number line attached below.
We observe the following from the number line
There is an open circle at 3, therefore the solution set does not include 3. (We make use of > or < in cases like that)
The arrow is pointed towards the right. All points to the right of 3 are greater than 3, therefore:
The solution in the number line can be written using set-builder notation as:
An inequality is solved by more than one value - usually an interval, or a union of intervals.
In this case, we have:
Add 14 to both sides:
Divide both sides by 12:
Answer:
Explanation:
Here, we want to find the bigger solution
We can start by factoring x as follows:
The bigger solution is x= 11
Answer:
Option 4) s is greater to or less than 15
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
C AAA is not an accepted triangle congruence criterion
Step-by-step explanation:
AAA can be used to show similarity, but not congruence. At least one side must be involved in any triangle congruence claim.
__
The student could have made use of the fact that opposite sides are the same length, and used AAS or ASA to show congruence.
