Answer:
GLOBAL minRoutine
AREA MYCODE, CODE, READONLY
ENTRY
minRoutine
MOV r0, #0xA
MOV r1, #0x3
MOV r3, #0x8
CMP r0,r1
BLT less1Routine
CMP r1,r0
BLT less2Routine
MOV r4,r3
less1Routine
CMP r0,r3
BLT cond1
less2Routine
CMP r1,r3
BLT cond2
cond1
MOV r4,r0
cond2
MOV r4,r1
END
Explanation:
- Inside the minRoutine, move the essential values to the r0, r1 and r3 registers.
- Check if a is greater than b by comparing value in r0 with r1.
- Jump to less1Routine, if value of r0 is less than value of r1. Otherwise go to next instruction
.
- Check if b is greater than a by comparing value in r1 with r0.
- Jump to less2Routine, if value of r1 is less than value of r0. Otherwise go to next instruction
.
- Finally move result of r1 into r4 register.
Answer:
You can limit by devices IQN, DNS name, MAC address, IP address
Explanation:
When you configure an iSCSI target, you define which iSCSI initiators can connect to an iSNSI by the client's IQN. You can also specify which servers can connect to the iSCSI target based on MAC addresses, IP address, and DNS name.
A belief is an attitude that something is the case, or that some proposition about the world is true.[1] In epistemology, philosophers use the term "belief" to refer to attitudes about the world which can be either true or false.[2] To believe something is to take it to be true; for instance, to believe that snow is white is comparable to accepting the truth of the proposition "snow is white". However, holding a belief does not require active introspection. For example, few carefully consider whether or not the sun will rise tomorrow, simply assuming that it will. Moreover, beliefs need not be occurrent (e.g. a person actively thinking "snow is white"), but can instead be dispositional (e.g. a person who if asked about the color of snow would assert "snow is white").[2]
There are various different ways that contemporary philosophers have tried to describe beliefs, including as representations of ways that the world could be (Jerry Fodor), as dispositions to act as if certain things are true (Roderick Chisholm), as interpretive schemes for making sense of someone's actions (Daniel Dennett and Donald Davidson), or as mental states that fill a particular function (Hilary Putnam).[2] Some have also attempted to offer significant revisions to our notion of belief, including eliminativists about belief who argue that there is no phenomenon in the natural world which corresponds to our folk psychological concept of belief (Paul Churchland) and formal epistemologists who aim to replace our bivalent notion of belief ("either we have a belief or we don't have a belief") with the more permissive, probabilistic notion of credence ("there is an entire spectrum of degrees of belief, not a simple dichotomy between belief and non-belief").[2][3]
Beliefs are the subject of various important philosophical debates. Notable examples include: "What is the rational way to revise one's beliefs when presented with various sorts of evidence?"; "Is the content of our beliefs entirely determined by our mental states, or do the relevant facts have any bearing on our beliefs (e.g. if I believe that I'm holding a glass of water, is the non-mental fact that water is H2O part of the content of that belief)?"; "How fine-grained or coarse-grained are our beliefs?"; and "Must it be possible for a belief to be expressible in language, or are there non-linguistic beliefs?".[2]
Answer:
Incorrect . or wrong . 7777777