Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a. Since the parabola is compressed by a factor of 1/3 we can state:
- a parabola is written this way : y=(x-h)²+k
- h stands for the translation to the left ⇒ 2*3=6
- k for the units down ⇒4*3=12
So the equation is : y=(x-6)²+12
b.Here the parabola is stretched by a factor of 2 so we must multiply by 1/2
- We khow that a parabola is written this way : y=(x-h)²+k
- (h,k) are the coordinates of the vertex
- the maximum value is 7*0.5=3.5
- we khow tha the derivative of a quadratic function is null in the maximum value
- so let's derivate (x-h)²+k= x²+h²-2xh+k
- f'(x)= 2x-2h h is 1 since the axe of simmetry is x=1
- f'(x)=2x-2 ⇒2x-2=0⇒ x= 1
- Now we khow that 1 is the point where the derivative is null
- f(1)=3.5
- 3.5=(x-1)²+k
- 3.5= (1-1)²+k⇒ k=3.5
So the equation is : y=(x-1)²+3.5
7.
the maximum height is where the derivative equals 0
- h= -5.25(t-4)²+86
- h= -5.25(t²-8t+16)+86
- h=-5.25t²+42t-84+86
- h=-5.25t²+42t+2
Let's derivate it :
- f(x)= -10.5t+42
- -10.5t+42=0
- 42=10.5t
- t= 42/10.5=4
When the height was at max t=4s
- h(max)= -5.25(4-4)²+86 = 86 m
h was 86m
Answer:
Samuel : x
wife : y
sum of their age : 2+ x : 10
Answer:
this look hard what grade
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
B. The solution is valid because all steps to solve the inequality for F are correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
F - 32 ≤ 0
Add 32 to both sides of the equation to have;
F -32 + 32 ≤ 0 + 32
F ≤ 0 + 32
F ≤ 32
It can be observed that to solve for F, the steps are correct. Thus the solution is valid. Therefore, the correct choice in the given question is the solution is valid because all steps to solve the inequality for F are correct.
x + 2y = 4
2x - 2y = 5
Adding both the equations:
x + 2y + 2x - 2y = 9
3x = 9
x = 3
y = 4-x /2 = 1/2
