Answer:
<em>Principle of differencial association. </em>This varies in frequency and intensity
Explanation:
This is because, the urge towards unfavorable actions is higher than that of favourable action. Example, some people have the urge to commit crime like armed robbery despite the fact that the are comfortable in life.
In essence:
I need to vent my anger or the sheer act of hiding my anger will cause me to fall apart.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Answer:
D is your anwers (interpreting and determining the application of Georgia's laws to its people)
Explanation:
The supreme court interprets laws
Answer:
its b
Explanation:
I've studied for biological
