Battle Of Tippecanoe & Thames - Harrison
Battle of Horhsoe Bend & New Orleans - Jackson
Battle of put in bay - Perry
Hi there. The way this question is stated is going to need some input from you to infer what was meant by the language.
This answer would be True. Because opportunity cost means more of one and less of another in simple terms, since in an economy we cannot utilize all of our resources at one time.
But I would caution that the language is in the simplest of terms! Since a more thorough definition would be that opportunity cost is the amount lost by not taking the next-best alternative. If your teacher and lesson usually describe opportunity cost and other terms simply, then I would say to go for it and choose True.
But if your lesson seems to be strict on definitions, then maybe that isn't the best definition. I would say it is good enough though because although simple, it does encompass the whole idea.
I hope this helps!
The earths carrying. Capacity
Answer:
Yes after the world war 2 the USA WAS LOST HALF OF THE AREA BECAUSE THE WAR WAS HAPPENED IN USA ONLY THAT TIME THE RUSSIA WAS THROW SOME BOMBS IN USA THAT TIME IN THAT AREA SOME HOUSES AND PEOPLE WAS NOT DIED THEY ARE EXPECTING BUT IN THAT AREA THE PIECE OF MAN ALSO NOT THERE AND THE WAR PLEASE ALSO SOME COLLAPSED THAT TIME THE RUSSIA WAS DEVELOPING MORE IN THEIR COUNTRY AND THEY FIRST IN THE GROWTH
They would cut of the limp that had the frostbite in order to stop it from hurting the victim and to stop it from spreading to the rest of the body. This is also known as decapitation.
