The Answer is B protects the rights of the accused
Answer:
For this problem we just refer to the descriptions that you placed under the prompt. According to Malcolm's bandmate, it would be easier to solve the trinomial by subtracting 350 from both sides and then factoring the equation. Malcolm, on the other hand, thinks that we should manipulate the equation in order to make it a perfect square trinomial.
2. This trinomial would be easily solved by using Malcolm's idea. As Malcolm pointed out, you just need to apply a formula to manipulate the equation then you can find the roots in no time. Finding the factors of 350 just to solve the trinomial would be the hard way to go since you would be considering a lot of them.
3. For this item, we are just tasked to follow what Malcolm's bandmate started doing. So, we would just need to think of two numbers that would result to -350 when multiplied. To start off, let's think of something we can divide 350 by, let's say 70. Now, if we divide -350 by 70 the result would be -5 therefore that would be our two numbers (p and q). p + q would therefore just be 65.
Explanation:
add up and keep doing it
Answer:
The nature of economic systems varies widely from place to place. However, they all help people create and obtain the goods and services they need. Countries form many types of economic systems to meet their citizens' needs and wants. The United States has a market economy.
Answer:
Opening Statement: The lawyers for each side will explain the case, the evidence they plan to present, and the issues for the jury to decide.
Presentation of Evidence:
Rulings by the Judge:
Instructions to the Jury:
Closing Arguments:
Deliberation:
Explanation:
Have A Great Day!!
Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
