This means the move from one sentence to another should be logical. The order in which information should be presented needs to keep the reader centred on the focus of the paragraph, developing points upon this topic in a logically sequenced way.
Answer:
1st question: A
2nd question: D
3rd question: not so sure.... but I think B
4th question: not a or c.... I think B
Explanation:
My legislature creates separate powers through two separate houses. Upperclassmen are represented in one house, and lowerclassmen are represented in the other. Each house must approve a new policy change, so both check and balance each other's power. Both of these principles are established in my government.
The passage above from Article 1, Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution reflects the principle of CHECK AND BALANCE.
The legislative branch is tasked to make the laws, the executive branch is tasked to make the laws official and executory, the judicial branch is tasked to review the laws based on its constitutionality and oversee the court system.
These separate branches have their own duties and responsibilities but they all share the same power. The power of any one branch is checked and balanced by the other two branches to ensure that no abuse of power is committed.
Answer:
It takes into account people's overlapping identities and experiences to understand the complexity of the prejudices they face.
In other words, the affirmative intersectional theory that people are often disadvantaged by multiple sources of oppression: their race, class, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, and other markers of identity. Intersectionality recognizes that identity markers (eg, "feminine" and "black") do not exist identified by each other, and each of the information to the others, often creating a complex convergence of oppression.
Explanation:
Today, intersectionality is considered crucial for social equity work. Activists and community organizations are asking for and participating in more dynamic conversations about differences in experience between people with different overlapping identities. Without an intersectional lens, events and movements that aim to address injustice toward one group can end up perpetuating systems of inequities towards other groups. Intersectionality fully informs YW Boston's work, by encouraging nuanced conversations about inequality in Boston. It illuminates us about health disparities among women of color, provides avenues for our youth leaders to understand identity, and is crucial to the advocacy work we support.
