Answer:
a. Incremental analysis.
b. Sunk cost.
c. Relevant information.
d. Opportunity cost.
e. Joint products.
f. Out-of-pocket cost.
g. Split-off point.
Explanation:
a. Incremental analysis: examination of differences between costs to be incurred and revenue to be earned under different courses of action.
b. Sunk cost: a cost incurred in the past that cannot be changed as a result of future actions. Sunk cost can be defined as a cost or an amount of money that has been spent on something in the past and as such cannot be recovered.
c. Relevant information: costs and revenue that are expected to vary, depending on the course of action decided on. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
d. Opportunity cost: the benefit foregone by not pursuing an alternative course of action. Opportunity cost also known as the alternative forgone, can be defined as the value, profit or benefits given up by an individual or organization in order to choose or acquire something deemed significant at the time.
e. Joint products: products made from common raw materials and shared production processes.
f. Out-of-pocket cost: a cost yet to be incurred that will require future payment and may vary among alternative courses of action.
g. Split-off point: the point at which manufacturing costs are split equally between ending inventory and cost of goods sold. Thus, it give rise to joint products that emerge from the same raw materials and a shared manufacturing process.
false general partners have legal authority to make joint decisons
A decrease in transfer payments has the same basic effect on aggregate demand as larger the marginal propensity to save.
<h3>What is aggregate demand?</h3>
Aggregate demand refers to the total amount of the money spent on the purchase of the commodity for the particular period of time. It includes the demand of the consumer goods, imports, and government spending.
When the change in the transfer payments, it affects the consumption level of the individual, which results in the shift in the aggregate demand of the product.
Therefore, it can be concluded that A reduction in transfer payments has the same basic effect on aggregate demand as an increase in the marginal propensity to save.
Learn more about aggregate demand here:
brainly.com/question/24319248
#SPJ4
<span>Michael Phelps needs to make swimming more accessible, and in that, I specifically mean more visible. Michael Jordan brought basketball to new heights and became a celebrity outside the game. That elevated both him and his sport. Phelps can do that, but he's yet to.</span>
