Answer:
Option A (is complicated, since culture would be a concept that is interpreted) is the right option.
Explanation:
- Maybe the most critical step for companies to take involves monitoring through cultural influences, and quite often these were overlooked.
- Towards being fair, it is difficult to consider cultural nuances when evaluating international markets, particularly considering culture isn't really inherently something that should be evaluated.
The other three choices are not related to the given scenario. So that option A would be the appropriate one.
Where are the following choices?
Answer:
Laissez-faire
One of the most influential ideas of the Gilded Age was laissez-faire (pronounced LAY-zay FAIR). From the French for “let them do [what they will],” proponents of laissez-faire policies, known as liberals, believed that the free market would naturally produce the best and most efficient solutions to economic and social problems. In other words, it was best to allow businesses to do what they wanted: trade freely, set their own prices, and determine workers’ wages and working conditions.
Liberalism, as it was known in the late nineteenth century, had a very different definition than it does today: instead of advocating for government intervention to solve social problems as today’s liberals do, liberals in the Gilded Age opposed most government intervention in the economy or labor relations. Libertarians are the closest equivalent to Gilded Age liberals in US politics today.
Laissez-faire combined the principles of limited government and the free market with some of the ideas of Social Darwinism. Applying Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution to human institutions, liberals believed that competition was necessary for progress. Any measures that interfered with complete freedom—defined as the freedom to buy and sell your labor and property any way you chose—were contrary to natural selection and impeded the march of civilization.
During the Gilded Age, this belief that laissez-faire capitalism produced optimal results for society came into conflict with the efforts of reformers and labor unions to rein in the influence of big businesses.
Answer:Yes, helping her grandmother provided consideration.
Explanation:
Consideration is anything of legal value that one party offers in exchange of another thing. For example Laura offers Sally a right to be an heir to her house if she comes and take care of her which Sally did. This is an obligation that Larry commited to and the consideration is valid since Sally did offer her service to her grandmother as an exchange to her recieving ownership of her home. Each party is required to commit to their consideration as part of an agreement of which Sally did her part and now Laura's obligation need to be fulfilled as per agreement.
There are two types of considerations:
Valuable consideration is promise of exchange that involves money.
Good consideration these are other valuables apart from money.
Both these type of consideration are legally enough to enforce someone to abide by a contract. The law doesn't weigh the quality of what each party exchanged even if they may not be of equal value but its considers the fact both parties might have thought it all through and felt it was fair agreement.