All categories

2 years ago

Which graph represents solutions of the equation y = x + 2? A B C

Mathematics

2 answers:

lisov135 [29]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Which ever graph has points in a line going down by 1,1 and has a y-intercept of 2

Step-by-step explanation:

That's the best answer I can give without a photo :(

(hope this helps!)

FinnZ [79.3K]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: Graf the line useing the slope and y-intercept, or two points.

Slop 1: 1

y-intercept:(0,2)

x y

----------------

-2 0

2 2

You might be interested in

Which transformations have been applied to the graph of f(x) = x2 to produce the graph of g(x) = –5x2 + 100x – 450? Select three

RSB [31]

Answer:

The graph of f(x) is shifted up 50 units

The graph of f(x) is shifted right 10 units

The graph of f(x) is reflected over the x-axis

Step-by-step explanation:

we have

$f(x)=x^{2}$

This is a vertical parabola open upward

The vertex is a minimum

The vertex is the origin (0,0)

$g(x)=-5x^{2}+100x-450$

This is a vertical parabola open downward

The vertex is a maximum

The first thing to note is that fx) is a parabola that opens up and g(x) opens down, so a reflection across the x-axis must have been applied.

Find the vertex of g(x)

Convert to vertex form

$g(x)=-5x^{2}+100x-450$

Complete the square

$g(x)=-5(x^{2}-20x)-450$

$g(x)=-5(x^{2}-20x+100)-450+500$

$g(x)=-5(x^{2}-20x+100)+50$

$g(x)=-5(x-10)^{2}+50$

The vertex is the point (10,50)

To translate the vertex of (0,0) to (10,50)

The rule of the translation is

(x,y) ------> (x+10,y+50)

That means ----> The translation is 10 units at right and 50 units up

therefore

The transformations are

The graph of f(x) is shifted up 50 units

The graph of f(x) is shifted right 10 units

The graph of f(x) is reflected over the x-axis

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which is greater 1,341 + 625 + 0 or 1/2 X 1341 + 625

konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We will try both by doing addition :

1341+625+0=1966

and

1/2*1341+625=2591/2=1295.5

As 1966 is greater then 1295.5 so 1341+625+0 is greater then 1/2*1341+625

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

2 2/9+ 3 3/7 +1 4/9 enter sum in a box as a mixed number in simplest form

viva [34]

Answer:

Input Data :

Mixed Fraction A =

Mixed Fraction B =

Step-by-step explanation:

wrong

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A. Do some research and find a city that has experienced population growth.

horrorfan [7]

A. The city we will use is Orlando, Florida, and we are going to examine its population growth from 2000 to 2010. According to the census the population of Orlando was 192,157 in 2000 and 238,300 in 2010. To examine this population growth period, we will use the standard population growth equation $N_{t} =N _{0}e^{rt}$
where:
$N(t)$ is the population after $t$ years
$N_{0}$ is the initial population
$t$ is the time in years
$r$ is the growth rate in decimal form
$e$ is the Euler's constant
We now for our investigation that $N(t)=238300$ , $N_{0} =192157$ , and $t=10$ ; lets replace those values in our equation to find $r$ :
$238300=192157e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{238300}{192157}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{238300}{192157} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{238300}{192157}) }{10}$
$r=0.022$
Now lets multiply $r$ by 100% to obtain our growth rate as a percentage:
$(0.022)(100)$ =2.2%
We just show that Orlando's population has been growing at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

B. Here we will examine the population decline of Detroit, Michigan over a period of ten years: 2000 to 2010.
Population in 2000: 951,307
Population in 2010: 713,777
We know from our investigation that $N(t)=713777$ , $N_{0} =951307$ , and $t=10$ . Just like before, lets replace those values into our equation to find $r$ :
$713777=951307e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{713777}{951307}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{713777}{951307} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{713777}{951307}) }{10}$
$r=-0.029$
$(-0.029)(100)$ = -2.9%.
We just show that Detroit's population has been declining at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

C. Final equation from point A: $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ .
Final equation from point B: $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$
Similarities: Both have an initial population and use the same Euler's constant.
Differences: In the equation from point A the exponent is positive, which means that the function is growing; whereas, in equation from point B the exponent is negative, which means that the functions is decaying.

D. To find the year in which the population of Orlando will exceed the population of Detroit, we are going equate both equations $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ and $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$ and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =951307e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{951307e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{951307}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t})=ln( \frac{951307}{192157})$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{951307}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=31.36$
We can conclude that if Orlando's population keeps growing at the same rate and Detroit's keeps declining at the same rate, after 31.36 years in May of 2031 Orlando's population will surpass Detroit's population.

E. Since we know that the population of Detroit as 2000 is 951307, twice that population will be $2(951307)=1902614$ . Now we can rewrite our equation as: $N(t)=1902614e^{-0.029t}$ . The last thing we need to do is equate our Orlando's population growth equation with this new one and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =1902614e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{1902614e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{1902614}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t} )=ln( \frac{1902614}{192157} )$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{1902614}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=44.95$
We can conclude that after 45 years in 2045 the population of Orlando will exceed twice the population of Detroit.

8 0

3 years ago

Please help me, I CANT fail this.

Annette [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago