<span>She is most likely to "set short-term goals
related to the task".</span>
A personal narrative writing is about
an individual affair, so it is generally composed in the first person. To
amplify its effect, the exposition should be composed to emotionally affect the
one who reads it. It should incorporate a considerable measure of references to
tactile discernment and feelings.
Answer:
General-purpose governments offer many different services while special-purpose governments offer specific services.
Explanation:
Examples of special-purpose are cemetery districts, water districts, and fire districts to name a few while general-purpose governments example is an Indian tribal organization.
Answer:
Examples of Primary Groups are Family, Friends, Close Highly influential Social Groups.
Explanation:
Primary groups are the social groups which are small in size are are called the small scale society for a person. People in such groups share their personal life, feelings, activities, etc. Primary groups are first hand close people. Primary groups make up small scale society. Family is the first primary group of a person, then comes the friends from schools, then close family relatives and highly influential people from close groups come. All primary groups play important role in a person's life.
Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Desafortunadamente, no especificas a qué país te refieres.
Cada país tienen sus propias políticas y leyes en materia de salud.
A falta de esta importante información, lo que podemos hacer con tal de ayudarte es responder en términos generales.
Los factores que influyeron negativamente en los resultados de las políticas de salud del siglo XIX es que realmente no existió un programa de salud pública bien establecido, en donde el gobierno tuviera la visión de invertir en la apropiada infraestructura médica y hospitalaria para enfrentar crisis en materia de salud. Los políticos, ni tuvieron la visión ni la iniciativa para crearlo.
De ahí que, y en base a la cultura del país y su forma de ser, actualmente permanece esa errónea idea de no contar con un verdadero programa de inversión, investigación y desarrollo en materia de salud pública.
Tan no existe, que desde el año pasado y debido al problema de la pandemia, la mayoría de países Latinoamericanos ha vivido en una permanente crisis sanitaria en donde los pocos hospitales que pudieran estar equipos para atender a los enfermos se han visto desbordados por la cantidad de pacientes y la poca infraestructura médica para poderlos atender.
