Jaime is incorrect, the angle does not depend on the radius of the circles.
<h3>Is Jaime correct?</h3>
Remember that an angle that defines an arc on a circle, does not depend on the radius of the circle.
So, if we have an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 3 inches and an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 6 inches, these two angles are exactly the same thing.
The radius of the circle only has an impact on the length of the arc defined by the angle.
So Jaime is clearly incorrect.
If you want to learn more about angles:
brainly.com/question/17972372
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is suppose to be -15.
Step-by-step explanation:
I do not see any statements
I can give you an explanation
Layla forgot to carry the negative
If you have 1 piece divided into 50 parts and take 19 parts away, your answer in decimal form will be (.38) The answer is .38
Answer:
A negative number
Step-by-step explanation:
I know this is right. Negative numbers represent opposites. If positive represents a movement to the right, negative represents a movement to the left.In the context of negative numbers, a number that is greater than zero is referred to as positive. Thus every real number other than zero is either positive or negative, while zero itself is not considered to have a sign. Positive numbers are sometimes written with a plus sign in front, e.g. +3 denotes a positive three.
I can't answer this question without a picture of the lines.
