The best answer i see is C) The natural features in an area include mountains, deserts, and oceans because these were all aspects of keeping native people from wondering to far.
"The Great Schism of 1054" / "East to West Schism" was the final speration of the eastern and western churches. (Protestant vs. Catholic) People broke away from the Catholic church for the first time NOT afraid of consequence.
The families during the 17th century New England contribute to social order by preserving religion, morals, and the local English customs. They also decreased the shock of adapting to a strange environment.
Women during this time handled most of the household chores like cooking, gardening, washing and making the clothes. They were also able to raised poultry products and sold it.
Answer:
Roosevelt was concerned that some Latin American countries were not paying debts they owed to European countries. He thought the Europeans might come across the Atlantic Ocean and use their military to force Latin American countries to pay back their debts.
Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.
In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.
In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.
