1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arlecino [84]
3 years ago
12

What is the fowlling passage?​

Law
2 answers:
Dovator [93]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

where is the question?????

Ede4ka [16]3 years ago
3 0
There is no more to this question..is there a picture you put with it or a passage
You might be interested in
Today, individuals who post content on social media Web sites are not held legally responsible for any forms of criminal activit
Lapatulllka [165]

Answer:

<h3>True.</h3>

Explanation:

No doubt individuals who post content on social media cannot just 'blow off some steam' unless it is thoroughly researched or proven otherwise. In most cases, individuals who post contents online are held legally responsible if their contents or statements are misleading or defamatory.

However, they are not held legally responsible for any forms of criminal activity as publishing wrong contents or making defamatory statements usually fall under the purview of 'tort' or civil cases. The parties are also liable to be sued for libel or defamation in civil courts.

3 0
3 years ago
1) What are some potential problems or risks of relying on the information provided by anonymous 9-1-1 callers to serve as proof
Bess [88]

Answer:

People like to call in and request to be anonymous because they know they are being nosy, or dramatic about a situation. Not always the reason though. But anonymous calls tend to have wrong information in them and can sometimes be completely false, and a way for one person to just try and get someone else in trouble. The problem with that is, you can't do a follow up depending on your department policy. Unless there is some sort of evidence, the person can't be charged, and by not having an available witness, it basically just makes the call a checkup to make sure no one is doing anything wrong.

No, unless a truly barbaric crime has occured, there should be no follow up. The caller wanted to be anonymous, so let them be anonymous unless they decide to come forward with more information.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
ASAPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!
o-na [289]

I believe its D but thats just my thought

4 0
3 years ago
In criminal law when someone does a wrong its called a crime. In civil law its called a ?
enot [183]

Answer:

Criminal law is the body of law that deals with crime and the legal punishment of party responding is called the defendant and the process is called litigation

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the scenario.
katrin [286]

Answer:

the answer is B

Explanation:

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • According to the article, what was the goal of the 1990 Encounter in Ecuador? Use evidence from the article to support your answ
    6·2 answers
  • A following distance greater than 3 seconds is advised when you
    7·1 answer
  • What does the constitution say
    5·1 answer
  • What is a definition of vested interest?
    13·1 answer
  • Describe what the principle of republicanism is and how it works.
    12·2 answers
  • Explain the Rule of Law and explain its development on the American legal, political, and governmental system.
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these is best example of a special interest group ?
    6·1 answer
  • 1. The Bill of Rights
    14·1 answer
  • If you are to comply with Medicare’s guidance regarding educational events, which of the following would be acceptable activitie
    6·1 answer
  • Anyone have the answers?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!