1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andrey2020 [161]
3 years ago
13

when it comes to historical research what do you think is the difference between primary and secondary sources ​

History
1 answer:
enyata [817]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

primary resources are things that come from that person say a autobiography or book secondary sources are things that come from a person that did not experience that even at first hand.

Explanation:

I got you

You might be interested in
House members are more concerned about their committee assignments than are senators because _____.
Eduardwww [97]

Answer:

D. the rules make it extremely difficult for representatives to Influence legislation on the House floor

5 0
3 years ago
All of the following contribute to a high risk of famine in Africa except
choli [55]

Answer:

a is the answer

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
where did the chinese nationalist party relocate after the communist takeover? a. tibet b. russia c. taiwan d. manchuria
Llana [10]

Answer: C, Taiwan.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
The ruling in miranda v arizona most affected the procedure in which step of this process
chubhunter [2.5K]
The arrest of a criminal suspect.

If you've ever watched a television crime drama, you've heard the "Miranda warning" -- or at least the beginning of it:  "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney ...."  There's a couple more sentences to the warning, but TV shows often cut to the next scene before hearing the arresting officer finish their recitation of the full warning.

Miranda v. Arizona was a Supreme Court case decided in 1966.  Ernesto Miranda was accused of kidnapping and raping a woman.  He confessed to the crime when interrogated by police, but attorneys argued that he did not fully understand his 6th Amendment rights.  After the decision in Miranda v. Arizona, it has become standard procedure in all arrests that the arresting officers must clearly state the accused person's rights -- their "Miranda rights," as they have become known.
5 0
4 years ago
Hey anybody wanna talk im lonely
Bess [88]

Answer:

yup I want to talk

hello

but i am not having any topic to discuss

lol

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Tea Act of 1773 gave which company the right to sell its tea to the American colonies without paying duties or taxes to Engl
    10·2 answers
  • What was an effective strategy for Jane Addams to learn the needs of residents at Hull House?
    14·2 answers
  • 3 pts
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement about Brown v. Board of Education is true? A. No one had ever tried to challenge school segregation in court bef
    8·2 answers
  • What religious group was the focus of attacks by european christians during the crusades
    5·2 answers
  • Who asked Lewis and Clark to lead an exploration of the western United States?
    13·2 answers
  • Axis Advantages early in World War Il
    5·1 answer
  • The encomienda system, the latifundia form of
    9·1 answer
  • What had the greatest effect on American industrial revolution?
    8·1 answer
  • PLS SOLVE THIS VINN DIAGRAM ON THE 6.02 The Papacy and Monarchy
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!