Explain five steps in product design for a business

Samson Company reported total manufacturing costs of $320,000, manufacturing overhead totaling $52,000, and direct materials use

Artemon [7]

Answer:

$204,000

Explanation:

Given that

Total manufacturing costs = $320,000

Manufacturing overhead = $52,000

Direct materials = $64,000

The computation of direct labor cost is shown below:-

Direct labor cost = Total manufacturing costs + Manufacturing overhead + direct materials

= $320,000 - $52,000 - $64,000

= $204,000

Therefore for computing the direct labor cost we simply applied the above formula.

3 0

2 years ago

The attitude adopted by Calvin Coolidge that government should play a small role in business affairs is known as what?

nydimaria [60]

Answer:

3) laissez-faire

Explanation:

Laissez-faire is a French expression that means to let us do, or applied to economics, let the economy self regulate itself. It was not a doctrine developed by Adam Smith, but rather by French economists who supported the idea of no government intervention in the economy.

President Coolidge believed that the government should not interfere with businesses and that businesses themselves were able to create prosperity for the nation.

3 0

2 years ago

Which of the following statements regarding diversity in the workplace is true? a. Nearly 73 percent of Fortune 500 companies no

kvasek [131]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Diversity in the workplace is about bringing together people of different background , physical appearance ,religion , education , age etc.

Even though of of the answer options narrowly talk about gender diversity , the employment policy of US in having over 50% of foreign born workers in the economy is wider as this would have covered citizens of different country with various cultures and tribes , different genders , color , religion and appearance and a whole lot more.

3 0

2 years ago

Imagine that the U.S. economy has an initial unemployment rate equal to the natural rate of unemployment. Identify each event as

PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Explanation:

Let’s explore one by one as proposed:

An oil cartel raises oil prices: all prices in the oil-related products will increase making it more expensive for companies to be able to afford employees. As the US economy is heavily based on oil import and consumption, the unemployment rate (let´s call it UR from now on) would increase. Countries that export more than import could benefit from this scenario.

The U.S. dollar gains value against foreign currencies: It would be more expensive to produce goods in the US as its currency becomes stronger. Hence companies could choose to produce overseas, increasing the UR. One of the factors that attract investments is a cheap currency, meaning that a company could operate there at lower costs than anywhere else.

American consumers expect higher income in the future: As fights about average salary would arise between employees and companies, igniting even sindicalization, its proper to think that the same as above could occur; companies could choose to produce overseas in countries less demanding of labor rights and income, such as China provinces (I would recommend for you to watch American Factory, a awarded Netflix documentary about that subject).

Brazil experiences economic growth and increases its demand for U.S. exports: as I said in the first alternative, a country that has increased or more expensive exports could benefit from that creating more jobs, in this case decreasing the UR. If Brazil demands more US products, more has to be produced by the country, which would mean more people employed in this attractive sector.

U.S. real estate values rise: to be honest, it only affects indirectly. As housing becomes more expensive, people have to work more to be able to afford housing. That would mean they seeking better-paying jobs or in the absence of those being homeless of at least unable to buy a home. We could argue that the UR would decrease because it becomes more expensive to afford housing and hence people would migrate more but that’s a long shot rationale.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

You plan to retire in 19 years. At the point of retirement, you want to be able to withdraw 32,877 at the end of each year forev

xz_007 [3.2K]

Since no any further contributions will be made to the retirement fund, the amount you need today is $172,014.

<h3>Calculation of Present Value and Present Value of a Perpetuity</h3>

The first step is to calculate the present value (PV) of the contribution at the point of retirement in 19 years using the formula for calculating the present value (PV) of perpetuity as follows:

PV in 19 years = CF / R ............................................. (1)

Where;

PV in 19 years = Present value (PV) of the contribution at the point of retirement in 19 years = ?

CF = Cash flow or yearly expected withdrawal = $32,877

R = Rate of return after retirement = 5.02%, or 0.0502

Substituting the values into equation (1), we have:

PV in 19 years = $32,877 / 0.0502 = $654,920.3187251

The amount you need today can be calculated using the present value formula as follows:

PV = FV / (1 + r)^n ……………………………………………. (2)

Where;

PV = Present value or the amount you need today = ?

FV = Future value or PV in 19 years = $654,920.3187251

r = rate of return prior to retirement = 7.29%, or 0.0729

n = number of years = 19

Substituting the values into equation (2), we have:

PV = $654,920.3187251 / (1 + 0.0729)^19 = $654,920.3187251 / 3.80737505803714 = $172,013.607470218

Rounding to the nearest dollar, we have:

PV = $172,014

Therefore, the amount you need today is $172,014.

Learn more about present value here: brainly.com/question/17322936.

3 0

2 years ago