Answer:
A. Tommy finding it easier to remember the materials on an exam while taking it because he was sad while studying for the exam
Explanation:
State dependent memory is when a person tends to remember more information when emotional state is the same at the period of encoding or learning and retrieval.
For example in this scenario Tommy is able to remember more information from when he was studying because he was sad at the time.
Having a similar emotional state during the exams made him to recall more of what he had learnt.
This is mainly dependent on internal environment of the individual.
Answer:
As per the history of the United States, during the drafting of the Constitution the people who favored federalism were labeled Federalists while the people who opposed were labeled Anti-Federalist.
Explanation:
Federalists likeAlexander Hamilton was in favor to strengthen federal government and Constitutional ratification to improve its performance, manage wartime debts, and effectively handle pressures after the American Revolution.
Anti-federalists like Thomas Jefferson opposed the establishment of a powerful central government and the adoption of the Constitution in 1788 but wanted authority to remain in the hands of state and local authorities. They also objected to the Constitution on charges of not having a Bill of rights to give the citizen fundamental rights such as freedom of speech.
Mr.Trapper's children will probably learn to tell the others how is important to use a seat-belts, but they will rarely use them themselves. Children imitate their parents. A model of behavior are learning in family-if parent wants to a child accept some type of behavior, it is very important that he behaves in that way. In this case, Mr.Trapper "ambiguous message" to his children-he talks about importance of something, but he does not behave like that.
Answer:
they are not facts.
Explanation:
the definition of pseudoscience is a collection of beliefs mistakingly regarded as being based on scientific method.
Answer:
The rest of the Question Reads:
You tell them all that at least one of them has green eyes. Then you leave, not thinking of the consequences (if any). Assuming that the dragons are (of course) infallibly logical, what happens?
Explanation:
Since there are no mirrors, they are unable to tell the color of their own eyes so they must rely on another dragon. If they are as logical as it comes two dragons sitting together will be unable to tell which of them really has green eyes.
Now it seems that there must be three or more dragons present for this to be solved. Imagine that there are Dragons A, B and C. They will look at each other and understand that one of them might have green eyes.
C will look at A and B
B will look at A and C
A will look at B and C
Two of the dragons will wait to see if one of them will transform and if neither of the two does then he will believe himself to have green eyes. At midnight, he will turn a sparrow. When this happens the other dragons that were in the trio will also believe that they have green eyes and will also turn into sparrows.
In conclusion, a group of dragons staring at each other will eventually all believe that they have green eyes and will all turn into sparrows.
