Based on the given information, it can be concluded that Derek is implementing the process of Depreciation.
<h3><u>Explanation:</u> </h3>
When dealing with assets whether fixed or non-fixed, the cost over its useful life is reduced in a systematic manner until it reaches zero. This is known as depreciation. It represents the value of the said asset that has been used up. The significance of depreciation is to allow the company to make revenue from the assets while the proportion of buying cost is expended during its service.
Failure to depreciate assets can negatively affect the company’s profits. There are different methods used to calculate depreciation and all depends on the following factors: salvage value, the asset cost price, and useful life.
Answer:
$29.70
Explanation:
Retention ratio = 1 - payout ratio
= ( 1 -0.5 )
= 0.5
Growth rate, g = ROE × Retention ratio
= 0.15 × 0.5
= 0.075
= 7.5%
Required return = Risk - free rate + [ Beta × (Market rate- risk-free rate) ]
= 2.5% + 1.44 × (11% - 2.5%)
= 14.74%
Intrinsic value = 
=
= 29.69 ≈ $29.70
Answer:
It does not
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to evaluate if a particular transaction carried out between a customer and an inn falls within the dictates of the local consumer protection law in the state.
Firstly, we look at what the local consumer protection law of the state talks about. It explicitly stated that customers should get receipts when suppliers receive deposits from them. Thus, this make the receipt act as the first thing to have if there would be any claim under the consumer protection law for the transaction carried out in the state.
Now, looking at the particular scenario we have, the customer paid for the room, but he was not issued a receipt. This makes the case not treatable within the consumer protection law of the state as the receipt which should have been a prerequisite for further exploration is not available
Answer: Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Sarah who is the controller of a large beverage supplier, supervises two employees and that her boss, Vladimir, told her to increase the company's inventory balance for an amount that is material to the financial statements by crediting several small "miscellaneous" expense accounts.
We are further told that Sarah does not know the reason behind this but told one of her staff to make them because she has been instructed to do so.
We can see that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue. She didn't evaluate the effect of what she is doing. In this case, what her boss told her to do could be a case of fraud and she just obliged without asking questions which will put her conscience at ease in case anything happens but the fact that she just did it without asking questions or thinking if what she has done is morally right or wrong, it shows that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.
Answer:
Partial balance sheet of Tamarisk, Inc.
<u>Non Current Assets :</u>
Buildings $1,140,000
Less accumulated depreciation—buildings ($652,000) $488,000
Coal mine $509,000
Less accumulated depletion—coal mine ($107,000) $402,000
Goodwill $421,000
Total $1,311,000
Explanation:
The Items above are Non- Current Assets. Non Current Assets are resources expected to generate economic benefits for a period exceeding 12 months.
