Fatima's claim is not supported by the table because, the distribution is skewed right, with a median of 0.4 field goal advantage.
From the table, the median position is calculated as:
![\mathbf{Median = \frac{1}{5} th}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7BMedian%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B5%7D%20th%7D)
![\mathbf{Median = 0.2\ nd }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7BMedian%20%3D%200.2%5C%20nd%20%7D)
The 0.2nd data falls in the 0.4 field goal category.
So, the median element is:
![\mathbf{Median = 0.4}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7BMedian%20%3D%200.4%7D)
However, the distribution of the table are concentrated on the left.
This means that, the distribution is not uniform, instead it is skewed right.
A uniform distribution has a skewness of 0.
Hence, Fatima's claim is not supported by the table
Read more about distributions at:
brainly.com/question/13233983