. HELP DUE IN A FEW MIN ASAP im stupidssssss

the amount of food a dog should eat depends on the weight of the dog. 1. identify the independent and dependent variables in thi

fomenos

Here, we are required to identify the dependent and independent variables, the dependency relationship in the situation.

The independent and dependent variables are the weight of the dog and the amount of food it should respectively.
The dependency relationship is thus; The amount of food a dog should eat is a function of the weight of the dog
The dependency relationship using the function notation is; f(x) = {function of x}.

The independent variable in this situation is the weight of the dog while the amount of food the dog should eat is the dependent variable. The above is evident from the statement; The amount of food a dog should eat depends on the weight of the dog.

According to the premise given in the question, it is evident that the dependency relationship is;. The amount of food a dog should eat is a function of the weight of the dog

The dependency relationship can be written mathematically using the function notation as;. f(x) = {function of x}.

Read more:

brainly.com/question/11239214

5 0

2 years ago

Clem Colfax had $10 to buy groceries. He needed milk costing 70 cents a carton, bread costing 60 cents a loaf, breakfast cereal

zaharov [31]

Cost of milk per carton = $ 70 cents = 70/100 = $0.7
Cost of bread per loaf = $60 cents = 60/100 = $0.6
Cost of cereals per box = $50 cents = 50/100 = $0.5
Cost of meat per pound = $1.50

If x is the number of cartons of milk bought, then
Number of loafs = x/2
Number pf boxes of cereals = x/2 +1
Number of pounds of meat = x/2 +1

Therefore,
0.7*x + 0.6*x/2 + 0.5 (x/2+1) + 1.5 (x/2+1) = 10
0.7x + 0.3x + 0.25x + 0.5 + 0.75x + 1.5 = 10
2x + 2 =10
2x = 8
x = 4

Substituting;
Milk cartons = 4
Number of bread = 4/2 = 2
Boxes of cereals = 2+1 = 3
Pounds of meat = 3

8 0

3 years ago

3y=11-2x, 3x=y-11 linear equation solve using the algebraic method check solution

tamaranim1 [39]

Answer:

(x, y) = (- 2, 5)

Step-by-step explanation:

given the 2 equations

3y = 11 - 2x → (1)

3x = y - 11 → (2)

Rearrange (2) expressing y in terms of x

add 11 to both sides

y = 3x + 11 → (3)

Substitute y = 3x + 11 into (1)

3(3x + 11) = 11 - 2x

9x + 33 = 11 - 2x ( add 2x to both sides )

11x + 33 = 11 ( subtract 33 from both sides )

11x = - 22 ( divide both sides by 11 )

x = - 2

Substitute x = - 2 in (3) for corresponding value of y

y = (3 × - 2) + 11 = - 6 + 11 = 5

As a check

substitute x = - 2, y = 5 into (1) and (2) and if the left side equals the right side then these values are the solution.

(1) : left side = (3 × 5) = 15

right side = 11 - (2 × - 2) = 11 + 4 = 15 ⇒ left = right

(2) : left side = (3 × - 2 ) = - 6

right side = 5 - 11 = - 6 ⇒ left = right

solution = (- 2, 5 )

5 0

3 years ago

A sample of 200 observations from the first population indicated that x1 is 170. A sample of 150 observations from the second po

igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

a) For this case the value of the significanceis $\alpha=0.05$ and $\alpha/2 =0.025$ , we need a value on the normal standard distribution thataccumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail and we got:

$z_{\alpha/2} =1.96$

If the calculated statistic $|z_{calc}| >1.96$ we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance

b) Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{170+110}{200+150}=0.8$

c) $z=\frac{0.85-0.733}{\sqrt{0.8(1-0.8)(\frac{1}{200}+\frac{1}{150})}}=2.708$

d) Since the calculated value satisfy this condition 2.708>1.96 we have enough evidence at 5% of significance that we have a significant difference between the two proportions analyzed.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

$X_{1}=170$ represent the number of people with the characteristic 1

$X_{2}=110$ represent the number of people with the characteristic 2

$n_{1}=200$ sample 1 selected

$n_{2}=150$ sample 2 selected

$p_{1}=\frac{170}{200}=0.85$ represent the proportion estimated for the sample 1

$p_{2}=\frac{110}{150}=0.733$ represent the proportion estimated for the sample 2

$\hat p$ represent the pooled estimate of p

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

$\alpha=0.05$ significance level given

Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if is there is a difference between the two proportions, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} = p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} \neq p_{2}$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}$ (1)

a.State the decision rule.

For this case the value of the significanceis $\alpha=0.05$ and $\alpha/2 =0.025$ , we need a value on the normal standard distribution thataccumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail and we got:

$z_{\alpha/2} =1.96$

If the calculated statistic $|z_{calc}| >1.96$ we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance

b. Compute the pooled proportion.

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{170+110}{200+150}=0.8$

c. Compute the value of the test statistic.

z-test: Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine whether the means of two groups are equal to each other.

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.85-0.733}{\sqrt{0.8(1-0.8)(\frac{1}{200}+\frac{1}{150})}}=2.708$

d. What is your decision regarding the null hypothesis?

Since the calculated value satisfy this condition 2.708>1.96 we have enough evidence at 5% of significance that we have a significant difference between the two proportions analyzed.

5 0

3 years ago

Find the average rate of change of the function f(x), represented by the graph, over the interval [0, 3]. Calculate the average

Over [174]

Answer:

[f(3) - f(0)]/(3-0)

[f(3) - f(0)]/3

7 0

3 years ago