Answer:
Explanation:
While the President customarily delegates supreme command of the forces in active service, there is no constitutional reason why he should do so, and he has been known to resolve personally important questions of military policy. Lincoln early in 1862 issued orders for a general advance in the hopes of stimulating McClellan to action; Wilson in 1918 settled the question of an independent American command on the Western Front; Truman in 1945 ordered that the bomb be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.206 As against an enemy in the field, the President possesses all the powers which are accorded by international law to any supreme commander. “He may invade the hostile country, and subject it to the sovereignty and authority of the United States.”207 In the absence of attempts by Congress to limit his power, he may establish and prescribe the jurisdiction and procedure of military commissions, and of tribunals in the nature of such commissions, in territory occupied by Armed Forces of the United States, and his authority to do this sometimes survives cessation of hostilities.208 He may employ secret agents to enter the enemy’s lines and obtain information as to its strength, resources, and movements.209 He may, at least with the assent of Congress, authorize commercial intercourse with the enemy.210 He may also requisition property and compel services from American citizens and friendly aliens who are situated within the theater of military operations when necessity requires, thereby incurring for the United States the obligation to render “just compensation.”211 By the same warrant, he may bring hostilities to a conclusion by arranging an armistice, stipulating conditions that may determine to a great extent the ensuing peace.212 He may not, however, effect a permanent acquisition of territory,213 though he may govern recently acquired territory until Congress sets up a more permanent regime.214
Washington DC is the capital
Correct answer choice is :
<h2>D) Ancient Greece was more reflective of the philosophy of direct democracy</h2><h2 /><h2>Explanation:</h2><h2 />
Feudalism in the Holy Roman Empire was a politico-economic policy of relationships among liege lords and enfeoffed vassals that made the base of the social structure within the Holy Roman Empire during the High Middle Ages. Greek cities set up democracies, most following the Athenian model, but none are as well documented as Athens. It was a policy of direct democracy, in which participating citizens voted quickly on law and executive bills.
At the time, the British demanded sugar which is why they colonized countries like Jamaica. So the first one is definitely A, and the next one is obviously A because the rest options can’t have constant war.
