Answer:
$48,000
Explanation:
Given that,
Ending owner's equity = $70,000
Beginning owner's equity = $45,000
Owner's withdrawals = $23,000
There were no new capital contributions during the year.
Net income (loss):
= Ending owner's equity - Beginning owner's equity + Owner's withdrawals
= $ 70,000 - $ 45,000 + $ 23,000
= $48,000
Therefore, the net income for the year is $48,000.
After computing the cost of inventory that was sold, The Cost of Goods sold is given as $1,334.30.
<h3 /><h3>The calculations related to the exercise are as follows:</h3>
From the information provided (see full question attached),
Inventory at hand as at November 1:
- there are 29 Units of Inventory at the cost of $5.90 dollars each.
Purchases:
- 118 units are purchased at $6.30 dollars each;
- 59 units are purchased at $6.15 dollars each; and
- 88 units are bought at $6.50 dollars each.
If at the end of the period there are 25 units each form the purchases above and 7 from the existing inventory as at Nov. 1st, then the cost of goods sold is:
((29-7) X 5.9) +((118-25) x 6.3) + ((59-25) x 6.15) + ((88-25) x 6.5))
= $1,334.30
Learn more about Inventory at:
brainly.com/question/24868116
The motives of those involved in unethical behavior that caused the financial crisis in the real estate, banking, and mortgage industries included Option A greed and the wish to inflate their own earnings.
<h3>What is
unethical behavior?</h3>
unethical behavior bare behavior that is contrary to the rules and principle of the organization.
In most cases it is usually as a result of greed and the wish to inflate their own earnings.
Learn more about unethical behavior at:
brainly.com/question/24518056
#SPJ1
Answer:
A strictly dominant action produces: a higher payoff than any other action the player can use for every possible action of the other players.
Explanation:
A strictly dominant action does not play fair. Here, there is no equality because strict dominance requires all payoffs to be strictly greater.
A strictly dominant strategy is that strategy that always provides greater utility to a the player, no matter what the other player's strategy is.
A rational player will avoid a strictly dominated counterpart because if his opponent uses strictly dominated action he will be come out worse off regardless of which moves other players make.
<span>Jorge has a debt ratio 37% which means he has more money to spend for the month, Jose has debt ratio of 102% which means he has relatively less money to spend in the current month and their take home pay is same. So their current financial situation is Jorge is currently solvent where as Jose is currently insolvent. So these are the conclusion drawn from their debt ratios.</span>
