Answer:
survey research has few limitations in terms of applications and information obtained
Explanation:
A survey research has many limitations regarding the applicability of the results and information presented by it. These limitations occur, mainly, due to the lack of homogeneity of the participants, who can present the most diverse characteristics, being a very heterogeneous, dynamic group that cannot be controlled. This prevents the survey from showing immutable data about something specific, and can only be applied in comprehensive and generalized situations. In addition, the data obtained in this type of research can be modified very quickly and lose its applicability.
It should be noted that survey research is research carried out to obtain information about something, based on the opinion of a group of people. An example of an opinion poll is the electoral polls conducted to find out which candidate for some political office is more popular than another, according to the population's intention to vote.
It is quite agreeable to a high extent that people living in the 21st century have a better life quality than people who lived in previous times.
<h3>What is the significance of life in 21st century?</h3>
The quality of life in the 21st century is quite better than that in the previous times. This can be stated because the infrastructure has improved a lot in addition to the technological advancements and age of computer that has improved the accessibility and mobility.
Therefore, the significance regarding the life in 21st century has been aforementioned.
Learn more about life in 21st century here:
brainly.com/question/13363504
#SPJ4
If Cathy blames her history teacher for her poor performance on a history test she is most likely engaging in: Self serving bias
Self serving bias refers to a way of thinking that always perceive ourself in a positive manner. People with self-serving bias often willing to over look their own mistakes in order to avoid the feeling of failure, which cause them to constantly blame other people for their own mistake.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The basic guideline in writing a title that is being considered when the researcher should not use any unfamiliar and hard to understand words to avoid confusion to the readers is that the research uses a comprehensive and clear title to prevent any confusion.
The title has to clearly express the purpose of the paper and be so interesting that people indeed want to read it. The researcher has to have in mind that the title should include the tone of the writing and it has to include keywords to facilitate the search if someone tries to look for the paper on the internet. It is as well as important to discard any useless word or jargon, slangs, and unnecessary ideas that are not well suited in the title.
Answer:
In Nazi Germany, three boys risked everything to spread the truth about Hitler.
Explanation:
The article tells the story of <u>Helmuth Hübener, Karl-Heinz Schnibbe and Rudi Wobbe, three friends who opposed the ideas of Nazism that Hitler </u>promoted while he was the Fuhrer of Germany
<u>These three boys risked their lives to spread information they had about Hitler and Nazism, the war and what was actually happening on the fronts. </u>
They were arrested, but Helmuth claimed he was the only one who handed out leaflets, the other two only knew about them<u>. Helmuth became the youngest opponent of Nazism who was sentenced to death and killed in October of 1942. </u>
<u>Rudi and Karl were sentenced to work in prison camps. They survived the war but stayed heavily influenced by everything that happened and the heroism of their friend. </u>
