Answer:
(D) I think
Step-by-step explanation:
Lets look at our answer choices; A.
The intervals are not comparable. The shorter bar spans more than 10 years. When it comes to a horizontal axis it doesn't matter how far it expands,just if it's expanded correctly.
B.The intervals are appropriately labeled. There not it goes from 25 to 50 in just in instant few climbs up.
C.The intervals are not comparable, but the data on the graph is not misleading. It is misleading the graphs are incorrectly labeled.
Which brings us to our answer D.The vertical axis does not have an appropriate scale. it goes from 0-25 25-50 and 50-75 then 75-100. that's a short distance for such numbers that are pretty far apart.
I hope I'm right and I hope this helps:)!
1.75 yards .its simple you just have to see how much youll have to multiply by 4 to get 7
Answer:
add up c
Step-by-step explanation:
<span>As the age of the U-235 sample is 2.631 billion years, and the half-life of U-235 is 713 million years, the sample has undergone 2.361 X 1,000,000,000 / 713 X 1,000,000 = 3.69 half lives. In each half-life the sample reduces to half its original weight according to the radioactive Half-Life Formula:
ln (Nt /N0) = -kt, where N0 = mass of the original weight of radioactive material, Nt = mass of radioactive material at time t, k = decay constant and t = time interval . We have to put Nt/N0 = 1/2 for time interval = half-life.</span>
Answer:
4 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
V=L×W×H
V=1 litre = 1000 cm³
H= V/LW
1000/(12.5×20)=4
height= 4cm
