Answer: a decrease in government expenditure and an increase in taxes by a decision of Congress; a decrease in transfer payments and an increase in taxes with no interference by Congress (D)
Explanation:
Discretionary fiscal policy is a government policy that changes government spending or taxes. The purpose of discretionary fiscal policy is to either expand or shrink the economy. It needs approval from the Congress and President. Its examples are increases in spending on bridges, roads, stadiums etc.
Automatic fiscal policy use spending in the form of taxes and transfer payments to automatically steady the economy. An example is when unemployed become eligible for the unemployment benefits after when losing their jobs during a recession.
Its easier to save it as a downloaded picture then you go into files on google drive or whatever typing site you use then you drag the picture from your files onto the document
Answer:
$96,154.20
Explanation:
We are to find the future value of the annuity
The formula for calculating future value = A (B / r)
B = [(1 + r)^n] - 1
A = Amount
R = interest rate
N = number of years
[(1.08)^9 - 1 ] / 0.08 = 12.487558
12.487558 x $7,700 = $96,154.20
They are reffered to as an janitor / cleaning service
Answer:
U.S. Tax Burden on Cola:
The amount of the tax on a case of cola is $4 per case. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $1 per case, and the burden that falls on producers is ___$3______ per case.
The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers.
a. True
b. False
Explanation:
The tax burden on consumers, which is represented by the difference in the price of cola from $5 to $6 per unit is $1 ($6 - $5). However, the cash received by producers reduced by $3 from $5 to $2. This shows that the total tax burden on both consumers and producers is $4 ($1 + $3).
This represents a total tax burden of $4 or about 67% based on the new selling price of cola or 80% based on the old selling price of cola.
"The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers alone. This because the price of cola would have increased to $9 per unit. Since the demand for cola in this instance is elastic, this change in price would have caused a more than 80% change in the quantity demanded.
