Answer:
The differing views on child rearing expressed by Locke and Rousseau highlight the debate on education through direct instruction versus self-discovery.
Explanation:
Locke defended the idea that the child is like a tabula rasa - a blank slate. That means the child learns whatever he/she is taught by means of direct instruction. On the other hand, Rousseau defended the idea that a child would learn through self-discovery, through spontaneous interactions with the world and others. To Rousseau, children should be given as much freedom to explore as possible.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "sit-in".
Explanation:
- The Warren Court greatly extended civil rights or liberties, judiciary as well as federal authority, it backed sit-in, finding that slaves who attempted to leave a separate lunch counter should never be taken to court.
- The Court adopted the per individual concept, a single vote, which indicated that legislatures needed to always be re-assigned based on population.
A salt marshes is a coastal ecosystem between the land and open area.The principle difference between where salt marshes and mangrove forests grow is called the salinity of the water.
<h3>
The principle difference between salt marshes and mangrove forests grow</h3>
Salt marshes and mangrove grown in the halophytes conditions which means the salt application is very high.
The mangroves grown near the coastal area and serves as the home for many different kinds of creatures and also serves as the best plant that prevents erosion.
Therefore, correct option is A.
Learn more about salt marshes, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/756092
The reason this leads to a conflict of interest, is because allowing politicians the power of redistricting creates a gateway for partisan gerrymandering, which is the act of manipulating the boundaries of an electoral constituency in order to ensure that a party wins seats in specific district.
