Answer:
-2/8is it's answer
Step-by-step explanation:
mark as Brainlist
Answer:
h(8q²-2q) = 56q² -10q
k(2q²+3q) = 16q² +31q
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Replace x in the function definition with the function's argument, then simplify.
h(x) = 7x +4q
h(8q² -2q) = 7(8q² -2q) +4q = 56q² -14q +4q = 56q² -10q
__
2. Same as the first problem.
k(x) = 8x +7q
k(2q² +3q) = 8(2q² +3q) +7q = 16q² +24q +7q = 16q² +31q
_____
Comment on the problem
In each case, the function definition says the function is not a function of q; it is only a function of x. It is h(x), not h(x, q). Thus the "q" in the function definition should be considered to be a literal not to be affected by any value x may have. It could be considered another way to write z, for example. In that case, the function would evaluate to ...
h(8q² -2q) = 56q² -14q +4z
and replacing q with some value (say, 2) would give 196+4z, a value that still has z as a separate entity.
In short, I believe the offered answers are misleading with respect to how you would treat function definitions in the real world.
Answer:
yes!!!
Step-by-step explanation:
Rewrite <span>88</span> as <span><span><span>22</span>⋅2</span><span><span>22</span>⋅2</span></span>.Factor <span>44</span> out of <span>88</span>.<span><span>√<span>4<span>(2)</span></span></span><span>42</span></span>Rewrite <span>44</span> as <span><span>22</span><span>22</span></span>.<span><span>√<span><span>22</span>⋅2</span></span><span><span>22</span>⋅2</span></span>Pull terms out from under the radical.<span><span>2<span>√2</span></span><span>22</span></span>The result can be shown in both exact and decimal forms.Exact Form:<span><span>2<span>√2</span></span><span>22</span></span>Decimal Form:<span>2.82842712<span>…</span></span>
