Answer:
(14 groups)
14 divided by 7 = 2
Therefore 14 is your answer
Step-by-step explanation:
lol that's all I got
I know this is not an answer but if your having trouble with this there is a website called Desmos all you do is type in the equation for the graph and it gives you the answer
<em>x equals 22</em>
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
____________________________________________
The Segment Postulate states the following:
<em>Given two end points A and B, a third point C lines on the segment AB if and only if the distances between the points satisfy the equation:</em>
____________________________________________
From the figure:
Our goal is to find x:
<h2>Learn more:</h2>
Dilation: brainly.com/question/2501119
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
512
Step-by-step explanation:
Suppose we ask how many subsets of {1,2,3,4,5} add up to a number ≥8. The crucial idea is that we partition the set into two parts; these two parts are called complements of each other. Obviously, the sum of the two parts must add up to 15. Exactly one of those parts is therefore ≥8. There must be at least one such part, because of the pigeonhole principle (specifically, two 7's are sufficient only to add up to 14). And if one part has sum ≥8, the other part—its complement—must have sum ≤15−8=7
.
For instance, if I divide the set into parts {1,2,4}
and {3,5}, the first part adds up to 7, and its complement adds up to 8
.
Once one makes that observation, the rest of the proof is straightforward. There are 25=32
different subsets of this set (including itself and the empty set). For each one, either its sum, or its complement's sum (but not both), must be ≥8. Since exactly half of the subsets have sum ≥8, the number of such subsets is 32/2, or 16.
Hi!
Shawna is correct because since it's multiplied to the 5-n you have to do the opposite which is division.
Dexter is also correct because after distributing you can continue solving, there is nothing wrong with that.
Hope this helps!
