1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ExtremeBDS [4]
3 years ago
8

A piece of copper tubing is in the shape of a hexagonal prism. The area of the base of the prism is 3 square centimeters. The vo

lume of the prism is 51 cubic centimeters. What is the height of the tubing? ​
Mathematics
1 answer:
Evgen [1.6K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: 17 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

For a regular figure where the area of the base is B, and the height is H, the volume is calculated as:

V = B*H

Here we know that the base of the prism is B = 3 cm^2, and the volume of the prism is 51 cm^3

Then:

B = 3cm^2

V = 51cm^3

If we replace those in the equation above, we get:

51 cm^3 = (3cm^2)*H

Solving this for H gives:

(51 cm^3)/(3 cm^2) = H = 17 cm

The height of the tubing is 17 cm

You might be interested in
The owner of a small restaurant bought 75 kilograms of rice. Each week, the restaurant uses 4.5 kilograms of rice.
leva [86]

Answer:

6 weeks 27kilo

12 weeks 54 kilo

Step-by-step explanation:

4.5*12=54

4.5*6=27

3 0
3 years ago
A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

                                                                            Predicted value

                           Active value                 Fraudulent       Non-fraudulent

                              Fraudlent                         30                       58

                          non-fraudulent                   32                     920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of \left( {b + c} \right)(b+c) and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, 30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040

The error rate is,

\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}  

The percentage is 0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and \left( {a + b} \right)(a+b) .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}  

The percentage is, 0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and \left( {c + d} \right)(c+d) .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}

The percentage is, 0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64

8 0
3 years ago
What is the measure of angle B? How do you know?
laiz [17]

Answer:

It is an acute angle. 15°

Step-by-step explanation:

because it has a small angle and is not very big.

6 0
4 years ago
A store sold 6 fruit trees. Five of the trees were apple trees.
slava [35]
5/6 of the trees were apple trees
3 0
3 years ago
Mike works part time at a grocery store. He also mows lawns to earn some extra money. He earns $9.50 per hour at the grocery sto
rusak2 [61]
I think the answer is $526
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the greatest possible whole number remainder if you divide any number by 41
    6·1 answer
  • (j)(k+4); use j=4, and k=6
    5·1 answer
  • 156
    11·1 answer
  • F(x) = -3^2 + 180x - 285
    6·1 answer
  • A 2-pint bottle of dish soap costs $9.44. What is the price per cup?
    8·1 answer
  • Estimate the volume.<br> A) 19 in3 <br> B) 40 in3 <br> C) 96 in3 <br> D) 144 in3
    15·1 answer
  • Use the laws of Sines and law of cosines to find missing dimensions​
    6·2 answers
  • Can someone help i need it much appreciated will give brainleist
    9·1 answer
  • The discriminant of a quadratic equation is 225. Describe the nature of the roots.
    7·1 answer
  • Answer the question about derivative
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!