1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kogti [31]
3 years ago
6

7. During the French Revolution, leaders promoted the ancient Roman idea of sacrifice of personal

History
1 answer:
ankoles [38]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

During the French Revolution, leaders promoted the ancient Roman idea of the sacrifice of personal interest for the good of the republic. What was this called?

Answer: this was also called the pursuit of the majority interest.

In the times of the French Revolution, French people decided to rebel against the monarchy of France that lived a lavish life, full of richness and exuberant luxuries while the French people were living in extreme poverty.  

As a political movement, it was, some people tried to take advantage or they managed some personal agendas during the Revolution. That is why Frech revolutionary leaders promoted the ancient Roman idea of the sacrifice of personal interest for the good of the republic, which means that the priority was to serve the interest of the majority, not any particular interest.  

You might be interested in
Which of the following is NOT part of both the Buddhist and Hindu religions?
Bogdan [553]

B.) Caste System is the correct answer

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one of the two major goals that the National Organization for Women worked toward when it was first founded? A. creatin
iris [78.8K]

C. protecting reproductive freedom

6 0
3 years ago
What was the first act of racial segregation passed in Oklahoma?
anyanavicka [17]
The Tulsa race riot of 1921. It happened between may 31 and june 1. 
7 0
3 years ago
What would have been the outcome of WWII in Europe if the US had been truly neutral? Would the result have been to the nation’s
Anna35 [415]

There is a great possibility that the end result of the war was different. For the entry of the United States into the war for victory was providential. If the United States had not entered, perhaps we would live in a different world now, if we consider the importance of the American entry into the war and all of its power in helping its allies to win.

3 0
3 years ago
Ships captains used astrolabes to
kkurt [141]
Originally used for telling time based on the angles of stars
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is it more likely that the plague originally entered Europe on the Venetian or genoese trade route
    13·1 answer
  • Why did Peter the great want to decrease the power of the nobility in Russia and have an absolute monarchy?
    5·1 answer
  • Take some time to think, and then use one paragraph of 3-5 complete sentences to respond to the following prompt:
    6·1 answer
  • What did Southern states claim would make them secede from the Union?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following foreign policy situations did Obama inherit when he took over the US presidency?
    7·2 answers
  • What four minerals did the colonist steal from the congo and in south africa
    15·1 answer
  • ASAP HELP PLEASE!!! Compare and contrast the economic systems of Socialism, Communism, and Capitalism.
    11·1 answer
  • Which kinds of taxes does Washington have? Check all that apply.
    12·2 answers
  • PLEASE ANSWER ASAP!! In your opinion was this expansion by the United States morally right or wrong? Give me three reasons to su
    12·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast the arguments for and against women's suffrage in the late 19th & 20th early centuries.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!