The answer is option A. The taxpayer’s employer
Hey best friend I think it won’t be a great idea to move into the city and work at the factories because first it is the hardest working job you can ever have, and it doesn’t help you get the best place and where I live it’s expensive and it doesn’t even come with a bathroom, and living in the city is awful as your sleeping you still hear all the cars and people walking by and when you try and go to the store your stuck in a commotion a crowd of people trying to go to different places it’s just hectic so stay where you are now please and I’ll come visit you sometime bye, from your best friend.
Answer:
The answer is: Businesses increased population.
Explanation:
Stock market crash refers to a sharp decline in the stock prices in a stock market. The decline can cause companies to borrow money in order to raise their funds.
In 1929, a stock market crash happened in the USA. The stock prices decline in four days, which highly affected the economy of the USA. The Wall Street, which powered America's financial sector and used to have a very good reputation, was ruined.
As a result of the crash, many people lost their jobs. In order to have money, they sold their homes and properties. They also lost their savings because they needed to cash on them. Due to this, many banks ran out of money. This led to the so-called <em>"Great Depression."</em>
So, the only option that was not a result of the stock market crash in 1929 is "businesses increased population."
Thus, this explains the answer.
Answer:
- Lane-Poole, “For the first time in their history, the Mughals beheld a
rigid Muslim in their emperor—a Muslim as sternly repressible of himself as of his people around him, a king who was prepared to stake his throne for sake of his faith.
- He must have been fully conscious of the dangerous path he was pursuing, and well aware against every Hindu sentiment. Yet he chose this course, and adhered to this with unbending resolve through close on fifty years of unchallenged sovereignty.”
-
Dr. S.R. Sharma, writing about the acts of religious intolerance of Aurangzeb has observed, “These were not the acts of a righteous ruler of constructive statesman, but the outbursts of blind fanaticism, unworthy of the great genius that Aurangzeb undoubtedly possessed in all other aspects.”
Aims of Aurangzeb’s religious policy:
- It is generally accepted that Aurangzeb was a fanatic Sunni Mussalman. His chief aim was to
convert Dar-ul-harb (India: the country of Kafirs or infidels) to Dar-ul-Islam (country of Islam).
- He was intolerant towards other faiths, especially Hindus. He was also against Shia Muslims.
Aurangzeb’s religious policy had two aspects i.e:
(i) To promote the tenets of Islam and to ensure that the people led their lives accordingly.
(ii) To adopt anti-Hindu measures.
Anti-Hindu measures:
Following were the anti-Hindu measures adopted by Aurangzeb:
- Demolishing temples and breaking idols
- Imposition of Jaziya
- Discriminatory toll far
- Removal of the Hindus from Government jobs
- Restrictions on Hindu educational institutions
- Conversion through different means
- Social restrictions
