Answer:
f(g(x)) = x
Explanation:
In order to prove that one function is the inverse of the other, all you have to do is substitute in the main function with the inverse one and solve. If the result is x, then it is verified that one function is the inverse of the other.
Now for the given functions we have:
<span>f(x) =5x-25
</span><span>g(x) = (1/5)x+5
We want to prove that g(x) is the inverse of f(x).
Substitute in the above formula and compute the result as follows:
f(g(x)) = 5(</span>(1/5)x+5) - 25
= x + 25 - 25
= x
The final result is "x", therefore, it is verified that g(x) is the inverse of f(x)
Hope this helps :)
Answer: 7x^2+21x+14
Step-by-step explanation:
(7x+7)(x+2)
Multiply each term in the first parentheses by each term in the second parentheses (FOIL)
7x×x+7x×2+7x+7×2
↘ ↙
7x×x calculate product
7x^2+7x×2+7x+7×2
↘ ↙
7x×2 calculate product
7x^2+14x+7x+7×2
↘↙
7×2 multiply numbers
7x^2+14x+7x+14
↘ ↙
21x collect like terms
7x^2+21x+14 is your end result.
Answer:
7,8,9
Step-by-step explanation:
The closest you can get to 42 with that equation and it has to use consecutive intergers is 41 and these numbers get you there.
I think the scale of the factor of area is 2
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
A rational number are numbers that can be expressed as as fraction. They can be expressed as a ratio of two integers. An irrational is quite the opposite. An irrational number cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers.
Taking square root of two as an example;
√2 cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers because the result will always be a decimal. If expressed as √2/1, it is still not a rational number because of the square root of 2 at the numerator. Square root of 2 is not an integer even though 1 is an integer.
Mark is wrong because √2 is irrational and it is irrational because it cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers <em>not due to the fact that he can write it as a fraction.</em>