1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
timofeeve [1]
3 years ago
9

Roman architecture was able to make great structures such as the Colosseum and the Pantheon through its use of...

History
2 answers:
Strike441 [17]3 years ago
6 0
I took the test concrete was CORRECT you are welcome
liubo4ka [24]3 years ago
4 0
Concrete. Romans were the ones who first made concrete. That is how a lot of their structures lasted. 
You might be interested in
What does the author mean by calling plantations the “backbone” of the Southern economy?
juin [17]

Answer:D

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which czar/tzar used police to maintain strict control over the people?
Nastasia [14]

Answer:

<em>Lenin, Stalin and the Bolsheviks used ruthless methods to surprises political rivals with tight centralization and secret police to enforce power with terror. ... in the </em><u><em>1930s,</em></u><em> in which millions of innocent people perished, had no rationale beyond ... Stalin had subjected all aspects of Soviet society to strict party-state control, not ... </em>

<em>Missing: </em><u><em>tzar </em></u><em>‎| Must include: </em><u><em>tzar</em></u>

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Russian cossacks can be compared to
quester [9]
They are like not of these.  Cossacks are part of the former Russian army.
4 0
3 years ago
10 POINTS
netineya [11]

Answer:

Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare that acts of the other branches of government are unconstitutional, and thus unenforceable. For example if Congress were to pass a law banning newspapers from printing information about certain political matters, courts would have the authority to rule that this law violates the First Amendment, and is therefore unconstitutional. State courts also have the power to strike down their own state’s laws based on the state or federal constitutions.

Today, we take judicial review for granted. In fact, it is one of the main characteristics of government in the United States. On an almost daily basis, court decisions come down from around the country striking down state and federal rules as being unconstitutional. Some of the topics of these laws in recent times include same sex marriage bans, voter identification laws, gun restrictions, government surveillance programs and restrictions on abortion.

Other countries have also gotten in on the concept of judicial review. A Romanian court recently ruled that a law granting immunity to lawmakers and banning certain types of speech against public officials was unconstitutional. Greek courts have ruled that certain wage cuts for public employees are unconstitutional. The legal system of the European Union specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review is also afforded to the courts of Canada, Japan, India and other countries. Clearly, the world trend is in favor of giving courts the power to review the acts of the other branches of government.

However, it was not always so. In fact, the idea that the courts have the power to strike down laws duly passed by the legislature is not much older than is the United States. In the civil law system, judges are seen as those who apply the law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles. In the (British) common law system, on which American law is based, judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. However, as Britain has no Constitution, the principle that a court could strike down a law as being unconstitutional was not relevant in Britain. Moreover, even to this day, Britain has an attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy. Therefore, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down legislation.

Explanation:

nationalparalegal.edu /JudicialReview.aspx

6 0
3 years ago
Help!!,!,!!,,’aisisisisisiskoaowcri
natta225 [31]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Around Florence, the Medici were known as "God’s banker." How did this reputation help them gain and hold onto political power?
    13·1 answer
  • What was one reform that helped transform Turkey in the 1920s?
    15·2 answers
  • Which civilization lived in longhouses? A. Anasazi B. Iroquois C. Powhatan D. Algonquian
    9·2 answers
  • Under the Articles of Confederation, why didn't the federal government enforce the laws?
    8·2 answers
  • The English words agrobiology and agriculture are derivatives of the Greek word agros. Based on this information, what is the mo
    12·1 answer
  • The use of ___ allowed Vikings to attack almost anywhere in Europe.
    13·2 answers
  • Domestic slaves...
    7·1 answer
  • Who won the electoral vote of 1824? (No one, right?)
    13·2 answers
  • Former President Reagan was elected twice by the people. He could NOT be elected to
    9·1 answer
  • ___?___
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!