This is a fraction equal to
7 yards ÷ 4 dresses
We want a unit rate where
<span>1 is in the denominator, </span>
so we divide top and bottom by 4.
7÷4= 1.75
_
4÷4=1.
Therefore, Kate used 1.75 yards per one dress (1.75 yds. p/ d)
Hope I helped! :)
A. 
To find greater than or smaller than relation, we multiply the terms like (numerator of L.H.S with denominator of R.H.S and put the value on the left side. Then multiply the denominator of L.H.S with numerator of R.H.S and put the value on right side. Now compare the digits.)
So, solving A, we get 810<209 ... This is false
B. 
= 238>589 ..... This is false
C. 
= 496>780 .... This is false
D. 
= 420<660 ..... This is true
Hence, option D is true.
Answer:
j = 10
Step-by-step explanation:
You add 7 to both sides then divide both sides by -2
Is the final value
P is the initial principle
r is the (annual) interest rate (as a decimal)
t is time (years)
10500%2Ae%5E%28%28.0625%2A25%29%29
Answer:
The conclusion "T" logically follows from the premises given and the argument is valid
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us use notations to represent the steps
P: I take a bus
Q: I take the subway
R: I will be late for my appointment
S: I take a taxi
T: I will be broke
The given statement in symbolic form can be written as,
(P V Q) → R
S → (¬R ∧ T)
(¬Q ∧ ¬P) → S
¬R
___________________
∴ T
PROOF:
1. (¬Q ∧ ¬P) → S Premise
2. S → (¬R ∧ T) Premise
3. (¬Q ∧ ¬P) → (¬R ∧ T) (1), (2), Chain Rule
4. ¬(P ∨ Q) → (¬R ∧ T) (3), DeMorgan's law
5. (P ∨ Q) → R Premise
6. ¬R Premise
7. ¬(P ∨ Q) (5), (6), Modus Tollen's rule
8. ¬R ∧ T (4), (7), Modus Ponen's rule
9. T (8), Rule of Conjunction
Therefore the conclusion "T" logically follows from the given premises and the argument is valid.
