Answer:
case A) This is a case in which apparently students can appeal to the fulfillment of the First Amendment that states the Freedom of Speech but I think that we have to remember that in any case our rights finish when we interfere with other peoples's rights.
I believe that schools, teachers and parents must get an agreement about what is good and bad for students because they are not mature enough to decide by themselves.
In the case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier the supreme court rules in favor of the school board and make the difference between a private forum and a public forum stating that a school is a private forum.
Imagine that students were allowed to do whatever they want and present whatever play they wish then the school would have no rules and when a place has no rules it becomes jungle law.
do i think school question) i need 1 more hour to think so i can awnser
I think that process is called erosion
Answer:
This is an example of informed consent.
Explanation:
An informed consent is a document provided to individuals when they will be <em>part of a trial, will start therapy</em>, etc.
It includes all the relevant information that the individual must be aware of such as what the study, therapy or intervention will include, what it will be about and the disclosure of information, amongst others.
In this case, Dr. Holly is letting her subjects know beforehand that they will have a weekly time commitment. She is informing them of such, thus providing an informed consent.
It’s B religious conflict
The answer is evolutionary psychology as this theory is the
one responsible of having to explain the evolution of an individual in terms of
their mind and their behavior in which it involves their psychological traits.
In the statement above, evolutionary psychology predicts that a person is more altruistic
towards relatives than close friends for this theory explains the psychological
behavior of an individual and how his or her mind affects his or her way of
behaving towards the society or towards other people around him or her. It
explains why a person is much closer to his or her friends than of his or her
relatives.
