Answer:
a) 2 h 45 min
b) 2 h 50 min
c) 2 h 20 min
d) 3 h 20 min
Step-by-step explanation:
Think of the power series ^2, ^3 etc as defining the characteristics of the <em>line on a graph</em> that the power function draws.
The awful reality is that the logical answer is buried in the axioms of set theory. So instead of having to teach kids axioms and derivations, just draw the lines on a graph as i described.
^0 = a line with zero slope, ^1 = a straight line with a slope of 1, ^2 = an exponential line... etc...
For kids, relating the power series to the shapes of lines on a graph will also help them later on when they learn about functions etc (like y = mx + c). Being able to associate the different powers with actual shapes on a graph will also help them to visualize relationships in physics, should they take that path. It's not the real truth, but a nice correlation with it's own merits.
Answer:
Part A none
Part B drawn
Step-by-step explanation:
Suppose the transversal intersects a pair of parallel lines it creates two pairs of alternate exterior angles.
Now if we look at the first figure we find that the alternate exterior angle 1 and 4 are equal . Also 3 and 2 are equal.
But <1 and < 2 are not equal . They are supplementary angles. Their sum is equal to 180 degrees.
Similarly angles 3 and4 are supplementary angles.
This situation does not support Ricky's claim. So you will select none in part A.
Now in part B we see that angle 5 &8 are equal and 6 & 7 are congruent.
This refutes Ricky's claims and this can be proved mathematically.
Angles 5 & 6 are supplementary angles. Similarly 7 & 8 are supplementary therefore they cannot be equal as they are unequal and a transversal is drawn not a perpendicular.
Are you sure you need help with that easy problem read it slowly then ask