1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rashid [163]
2 years ago
10

Which line from L, M and N is the line of best fit for this scatter plot?

Mathematics
1 answer:
docker41 [41]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

it would be line M. because there is more dots around the line than compared to the 9thwr lines so m would be the best choice.

You might be interested in
express the equation a)20 less than a number b)half a number is another number.There sum is 30 c)2/3 if weight of a boy is 32kg
Ivan
A) n-20
b.)30=1/2n+1/2
c.)2/3n=30
d.)5n=90
e.)M•3+4=49
3 0
3 years ago
Someone please answer !!!!
Goryan [66]
The answer is C

By the way, that expression means "n choose k". Hope I helped!
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A. Do some research and find a city that has experienced population growth.
horrorfan [7]
A. The city we will use is Orlando, Florida, and we are going to examine its population growth from 2000 to 2010. According to the census the population of Orlando was 192,157 in 2000 and 238,300 in 2010. To examine this population growth period, we will use the standard population growth equation N_{t} =N _{0}e^{rt}
where:
N(t) is the population after t years
N_{0} is the initial population 
t is the time in years 
r is the growth rate in decimal form 
e is the Euler's constant 
We now for our investigation that N(t)=238300, N_{0} =192157, and t=10; lets replace those values in our equation to find r:
238300=192157e^{10r}
e^{10r} = \frac{238300}{192157}
ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{238300}{192157} )
r= \frac{ln( \frac{238300}{192157}) }{10}
r=0.022
Now lets multiply r by 100% to obtain our growth rate as a percentage:
(0.022)(100)=2.2%
We just show that Orlando's population has been growing at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

B. Here we will examine the population decline of Detroit, Michigan over a period of ten years: 2000 to 2010.
Population in 2000: 951,307
Population in 2010: 713,777
We know from our investigation that N(t)=713777, N_{0} =951307, and t=10. Just like before, lets replace those values into our equation to find r:
713777=951307e^{10r}
e^{10r} = \frac{713777}{951307}
ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{713777}{951307} )
r= \frac{ln( \frac{713777}{951307}) }{10}
r=-0.029
(-0.029)(100)= -2.9%.
We just show that Detroit's population has been declining at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

C. Final equation from point A: N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}.
Final equation from point B: N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}
Similarities: Both have an initial population and use the same Euler's constant.
Differences: In the equation from point A the exponent is positive, which means that the function is growing; whereas, in equation from point B the exponent is negative, which means that the functions is decaying.

D. To find the year in which the population of Orlando will exceed the population of Detroit, we are going equate both equations N(t)=192157e^{0.022t} and N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t} and solve for t:
192157e^{0.022t} =951307e^{-0.029t}
\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{951307e^{-0.029t} } =1
e^{0.051t} = \frac{951307}{192157}
ln(e^{0.051t})=ln( \frac{951307}{192157})
t= \frac{ln( \frac{951307}{192157}) }{0.051}
t=31.36
We can conclude that if Orlando's population keeps growing at the same rate and Detroit's keeps declining at the same rate, after 31.36 years in May of 2031 Orlando's population will surpass Detroit's population.

E. Since we know that the population of Detroit as 2000 is 951307, twice that population will be 2(951307)=1902614. Now we can rewrite our equation as: N(t)=1902614e^{-0.029t}. The last thing we need to do is equate our Orlando's population growth equation with this new one and solve for t:
192157e^{0.022t} =1902614e^{-0.029t}
\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{1902614e^{-0.029t} } =1
e^{0.051t} = \frac{1902614}{192157}
ln(e^{0.051t} )=ln( \frac{1902614}{192157} )
t= \frac{ln( \frac{1902614}{192157}) }{0.051}
t=44.95
We can conclude that after 45 years in 2045 the population of Orlando will exceed twice the population of Detroit. 

  
8 0
3 years ago
What is the next term of the geometric sequence?
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

16

Step-by-step explanation:

In a geometric sequence you are just multiplying basically. To go from 36 to 24, you multiply by 2/3, and the same will be with the next term. When you multiply 24 by 2/3 you get 16.

6 0
2 years ago
All statements about opposite that are true.
ivolga24 [154]
Whats the topic that you want me to tell about
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If 24 marks is 60% what is full marks
    9·1 answer
  • Is 7.38 a mixed decimal
    15·2 answers
  • 1, 5, 9, 13...
    7·1 answer
  • The product of two numbers is 24. their difference is 5. what are the two numbers?
    5·2 answers
  • Each basket in basketball is worth 2 points. Cathy makes 5 baskets
    14·1 answer
  • We have an object with a density or 620 g/cm and a volume of 75cm. What is the mass of the object
    13·2 answers
  • What are all the factors of 32?
    9·1 answer
  • Somebody help me give the the answer
    14·1 answer
  • How many solutions does the system have?
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME I REALLY NEED IT
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!